Search publications

Reset filters Search by keyword

No publications found.

 

Endangered species laws and the inclusion of Indigenous knowledges and sciences in risk assessments

Authors: Grimm JSoares BEZanjani LVBallard MChiblow SAndrade RSDuncan ATFraser DJMandrak NEBernos TA


Affiliations

1 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
2 Institute of Environmental Change & Society, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada.
3 Department of Geography, Planning and Environment, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
4 Department of Earth, Energy and Environment, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
5 School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
6 Rio de Janeiro Botanical Garden, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
7 Centre for Indigenous Fisheries, Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
8 Department of Biology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
9 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
10 Rubenstein Ecosystem Science Laboratory, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.

Description

Indigenous Peoples actively manage or have tenure rights over lands where many rare and valued species occur. To meet national and global conservation targets, it is important to meaningfully consider Indigenous knowledges and rights in endangered species laws. We examined whether the Canadian Species at Risk Act (SARA) has upheld its commitment to consider Indigenous knowledges in decisions pertaining to endangered species assessment. Using data from 823 species status assessments published from 1998 to 2023, we constructed indicators and derived a composite score for 5 tenets of Indigenized models of conservation: those that center Indigenous sovereignty, incorporate place-based knowledges, emphasize interconnectedness, draw from Indigenous knowledge sources, and recognize the cultural importance of species. Over the last quarter century, we found no evidence of improved consideration or inclusion of Indigenous knowledges and science in species status assessments. Although status assessments in northern jurisdictions tended to be better aligned with Indigenized frameworks of conservation, mean composite scores remained low across status assessments (mean = 0.9/5 in 2023). To advance the meaningful consideration of Indigenous Peoples and their knowledges in conservation practices and policies, we recommend honoring endangered species laws' specifications to consider Indigenous knowledges at every step of the process, from species assessment, to increasing capacity, to meaningfully engaging Indigenous Peoples.


Keywords: ATKAboriginal traditional knowledgesCTAIndigenous knowledgesIndigenous scienceLey de Especies en RiesgoSARASpecies at Risk Actciencia indígenaconocimiento indígenaconocimiento tradicional aborigenconsultaconsultationend


Links

PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41684052/

DOI: 10.1111/cobi.70235