Keyword search (3,448 papers available)


A person-centered perspective on the factors associated with the work recovery process.

Author(s): Gillet N, Morin AJS, Mokounkolo R, Réveillère C, Fouquereau E

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This research identified profiles characterized by distinct levels of overcommitment, rumination, psychological detachment (Studies 1 and 2), and need for recovery (Study 2). This research also considers the role of hindrance dema...

Article GUID: 33380222
Editorial.

Author(s): Gaudreau P, Ellenbogen MA

Anxiety Stress Coping. 2018 01;31(1):1-3 Authors: Gaudreau P, Ellenbogen MA PMID: 29037068 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Article GUID: 29037068
Introduction to the special section on biopsychosocial moderators of the stress response.

Author(s): Ellenbogen MA

Anxiety Stress Coping. 2012 Jul;25(4):359-64 Authors: Ellenbogen MA PMID: 22646814 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Article GUID: 22646814
Title:A person-centered perspective on the factors associated with the work recovery process.
Authors:Gillet N,  Morin AJS,  Mokounkolo R,  Réveillère C,  Fouquereau E
Link:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33380222
DOI:10.1080/10615806.2020.1866174
Category:Anxiety Stress Coping
PMID:33380222
Dept Affiliation: PSYCHOLOGY
1 UFR Arts et Sciences Humaines, Département de psychologie, Université de Tours, Tours, France.
2 UFR Arts et Sciences Humaines, Département de psychologie, Institut Universitaire de France, Tours, France.
3 Substantive Methodological Synergy Research Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.

Description:

A person-centered perspective on the factors associated with the work recovery process.

Anxiety Stress Coping. 2020 Dec 31; :1-26

Authors: Gillet N, Morin AJS, Mokounkolo R, Réveillère C, Fouquereau E

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This research identified profiles characterized by distinct levels of overcommitment, rumination, psychological detachment (Studies 1 and 2), and need for recovery (Study 2). This research also considers the role of hindrance demands and resources in the prediction of profile membership, and the outcomes of these profiles.

METHODS: These objectives were addressed in two empirical cross-sectional studies relying on self-reported questionnaires. Study 1 relies on a convenience sample of French workers from a variety of occupations. Study 2 relies on a convenience sample of French nurses and nursing assistants.

RESULTS: Latent profile analyses revealed four identical profiles in both studies (High Ability to Achieve Recovery, Moderately High Ability to Achieve Recovery, Moderately Low Ability to Achieve Recovery, and Low Ability to Achieve Recovery), accompanied by an additional (Normative) profile in Study 2. The results from both studies revealed well-differentiated outcome associations, which generally matched the theoretical desirability of the identified profiles. Likewise, hindrance demands were associated with a decreased likelihood of membership into the High Ability to Achieve Recovery profile, as well as an increased likelihood of membership into the Low Ability to Achieve Recovery profile across studies.

CONCLUSIONS: Theoretical contributions and implications for practice are discussed.

PMID: 33380222 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]