Reset filters

Search publications


By keyword
By department

No publications found.

 

Modeling of Flame Retardants in Typical Urban Indoor Environments in China during 2010-2030: Influence of Policy and Decoration and Implications for Human Exposure

Authors: Li ZZhu YWang DZhang XJones KCMa JWang PYang RLi YPei ZZhang QJiang G


Affiliations

1 State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China.
2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
3 School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.
4 Laboratory (Hangzhou) for Risk Assessment of Agricultural Products of Ministry of Agriculture, Institute of Quality and Standard for Agro-products, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, Zhejiang, China.
5 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke Street, West Montreal, Quebec H4B 1R6, Canada.
6 Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, United Kingdom.
7 Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University

Description

Novel flame retardants (FRs) are of increasing concern, given growing evidence of health effects and use to replace polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs). This study modeled combined effects of use policies and decoration on indoor FRs and human exposure for 18 widely used PBDEs, organophosphate esters (OPEs), and novel brominated flame retardants in typical urban indoor environments in China. The current estimated indoor emission rates and average concentrations in air and dust of the 18 FRs were 102-103 ng/h, 561 ng/m3, and 1.5 × 104 ng/g, respectively, with seven OPEs dominant (>69%). Different use patterns exist between China and the US and Europe. Scenarios modeled over 2010-2030 suggested that decoration would affect indoor concentrations of FRs more than use policies, and use policies were mainly responsible for shifts of FR composition. Additional use of hexabromobenzene and 2,3,4,5,6-pentabromotoluene and removal of BDE-209 would make the total human exposure to the modeled FR mixture increase after the restriction of penta- and octa-BDE but decrease after deca-BDE was banned. Better knowledge of the toxicity of substitutes is needed for a complete understanding of the health implications of such changes. Toddlers may be more affected by use changes than adults. Such studies are supportive to the management of FR use.


Keywords: chemical use policydecorationflame retardantsindoor chemical exposure modelindoor contamination


Links

PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34410710/

DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.1c03402