Reset filters

Search publications


By keyword
By department

No publications found.

 

A Public Health Ethics Case for Mitigating Zoonotic Disease Risk in Food Production

Authors: Bernstein JDutkiewicz J


Affiliations

1 Department of Philosophy, Florida Atlantic University, 777 Glades Road - SO 283, Boca Raton, FL 33431-0991 USA.
2 Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Concordia University, 1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd. West, Montréal, QC H2G 1M8 Canada.

Description

This article argues that governments in countries that currently permit intensive animal agriculture - especially but not exclusively high-income countries - are, in principle, morally justified in taking steps to restrict or even eliminate intensive animal agriculture to protect public health from the risk of zoonotic pandemics. Unlike many extant arguments for restricting, curtailing, or even eliminating intensive animal agriculture which focus on environmental harms, animal welfare, or the link between animal source food (ASF) consumption and noncommunicable disease, the argument in this article appeals to the value of protecting populations from future global health emergencies and their broad social, economic, and health impacts, taking the SARS-CoV-2 virus as a particularly salient example. The article begins by identifying how intensive animal agriculture contributes to the outbreak (and risk of future outbreaks) of zoonotic diseases. Next, we explore three specific policy options: 1. Incentivizing plant-based and cell-based ASF alternatives through government subsidies; 2. Disincentivizing intensive ASF production through the adoption of a "zoonotic tax"; and 3. Eliminating intensive ASF production through a total ban. We argue that all three of these measures are permissible, although we remain agnostic as to whether these measures are obligatory. We argue for this conclusion on the grounds that each measure is justified by the same sorts of considerations that justify other widely accepted public health interventions, and each is compatible with a variety of theories of justice. We then address potential objections. Finally, we discuss how our novel argument relates to extant ethical arguments in favor or curtailing ASF production and consumption.


Keywords: Animal agricultureCOVID-19Political philosophyPublic health ethicsZoonotic disease


Links

PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33997264/

DOI: 10.1007/s41055-021-00089-6