Reset filters

Search publications


By keyword
By department

No publications found.

 

Comparison of multifidus muscle intramuscular fat by ultrasound echo intensity and fat-water based MR images in individuals with chronic low back pain

Authors: Crook JMasi SNaghdi NRoussac ARye MRosenstein BRivaz HBoily MWeber MHFortin M


Affiliations

1 Concordia University, Department Health Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
2 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; PERFORM Centre, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
3 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
4 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
5 Concordia University, Department Health Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; PERFORM Centre, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Centre de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Réadaptation (CRIR), Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Electronic address: maryse.fortin@concordia.ca.

Description

Purpose: The aim of this observational cross-sectional study was to examine correlations of intramuscular fat content in lumbar multifidus (LM) by comparing muscle echo intensity (EI) and percent fat signal fraction (%FSF) generated from ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance (MR) images, respectively.

Methods: MRI and US images from 25 participants (16 females, 9 males) selected from a cohort of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) were used. Images were acquired bilaterally, at the L4 and L5 levels (e.g., 4 sites). EI measurements were acquired by manually tracing the cross-sectional border of LM. Mean EI of three US images per site were analyzed (e.g., raw EI). A correction factor for subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT) was also calculated and applied (e.g., corrected EI). Corresponding fat and water MR images were used to acquire %FSF measurements. Intra-rater reliability was assessed by intraclass coefficients (ICC). Pearson correlations and simple linear regression were used to assess the relationship between %FSF, raw EI and corrected EI measurements.

Results: The intra-rater ICCs for all measurements were moderate to excellent. Correlations between %FSF vs. raw EI and corrected EI were moderate to strong (0.40 < r < 0.52) and (0.40 < r < 0.51), respectively. Moderate correlations between SFT and EI were also identified.

Conclusion: US is a low-cost, non-invasive, accessible, and reliable method to examine muscle composition, and presents a promising solution for assessing and monitoring the effect of different treatment options for CLBP in clinical settings.


Links

PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36658047/

DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2023.102717