BookR: School of Health Core Facilities Booking
PubMed Publications| Keyword search (4,164 papers available) |  |
"Bacon S" Authored Publications:
| Title | Authors | PubMed ID | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Identifying priority questions regarding rapid systematic reviews' methods: protocol for an eDelphi study | Vieira AM; Szczepanik G; de Waure C; Tricco AC; Oliver S; Stojanovic J; Ribeiro PAB; Pollock D; Akl EA; Lavis J; Kuchenmuller T; Bragge P; Langer L; Bacon S; | 37419644 HKAP |
| 2 | Methods to assess ambivalence towards food and diet: a scoping review | Hayashi D; Carvalho SDL; Ribeiro PAB; Rodrigues RCM; São-João TM; Lavoie K; Bacon S; Cornélio ME; | 37226601 HKAP |
| 3 | Assessing Physician's Motivational Communication Skills: 5-Step Mixed Methods Development Study of the Motivational Communication Competency Assessment Test | Gosselin Boucher V; Bacon S; Voisard B; Dragomir AI; Gemme C; Larue F; Labbé S; Szczepanik G; Corace K; Campbell T; Vallis M; Garber G; Rouleau C; Diodati JG; Rabi D; Sultan S; Lavoie K; | 35749167 HKAP |
| 4 | Understanding national trends in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Canada: results from five sequential cross-sectional representative surveys spanning April 2020-March 2021 | Lavoie K; Gosselin-Boucher V; Stojanovic J; Gupta S; Gagné M; Joyal-Desmarais K; Séguin K; Gorin SS; Ribeiro P; Voisard B; Vallis M; Corace K; Presseau J; Bacon S; | 35383087 HKAP |
| 5 | Ending the Pandemic: How Behavioural Science Can Help Optimize Global COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake | Vallis M; Bacon S; Corace K; Joyal-Desmarais K; Sheinfeld Gorin S; Paduano S; Presseau J; Rash J; Mengistu Yohannes A; Lavoie K; | 35062668 HKAP |
| 6 | Canadian Cardiovascular Harmonized National Guidelines Endeavour (C-CHANGE) guideline for the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease in primary care: 2018 update. | Tobe SW, Stone JA, Anderson T, Bacon S, Cheng AYY, Daskalopoulou SS, Ezekowitz JA, Gregoire JC, Gubitz G, Jain R, Keshavjee K, Lindsay P, L'Abbe M, Lau DCW, Leiter LA, O'Meara E, Pearson GJ, Rabi DM, Sherifali D, Selby P, Tu JV, Wharton S, Walker KM, Hua-Stewart D, Liu PP | 30301743 HKAP |
| Title: | Methods to assess ambivalence towards food and diet: a scoping review | ||||
| Authors: | Hayashi D, Carvalho SDL, Ribeiro PAB, Rodrigues RCM, São-João TM, Lavoie K, Bacon S, Cornélio ME | ||||
| Link: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37226601/ | ||||
| DOI: | 10.1111/jhn.13192 | ||||
| Publication: | Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association | ||||
| Keywords: | attitudinal ambivalence; diet; eating behaviour; food; review; | ||||
| PMID: | 37226601 | Category: | Date Added: | 2023-05-25 | |
| Dept Affiliation: |
HKAP
1 School of Nursing (FEnf), University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. 2 Montreal Behavioural Medicine Centre (MBMC), Montreal, CIUSSS-NIM, Quebec, Canada. 3 College of Nursing, University of Rhode Island, Providence, Rhode Island, USA. 4 Department of Psychology, University of Quebec at Montreal (UQAM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 5 Department of Health, Kinesiology, and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. |
||||
Description: |
Background: Ambivalence towards food and diet, which favours behavioural inertia, might be a barrier to adopting healthier eating behaviours. Measuring it can help researchers to better understand its relationship with behaviour change and design interventions aimed at resolving it. In this scoping review, we map and describe methods and tools employed in studies to assess, measure or classify the ambivalence of participants towards food- and diet-related attitude objects. Methods: In accordance with Joanna Briggs Institute guidance for conducting scoping reviews, we retrieved peer-reviewed studies from MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, FSTA and Food Science Source and preprints from PsyArXiv and MedRxiv. Two independent reviewers screened the articles. We considered for inclusion peer-reviewed studies and preprints that assessed the ambivalence of participants of any age, sex or sociodemographic group towards food and diet. Results: We included 45 studies published between 1992 and 2022, which included participants from 17 countries. Eighteen methods were employed across the included studies to assess different types of ambivalence (felt, potential or cognitive-affective), the most frequent of which were the Griffin Index, the Subjective Ambivalence Questionnaire, the MouseTracker Paradigm and the Orientation to Chocolate Questionnaire. Conclusion: This scoping review identified several methods and tools to assess different types of ambivalence towards food- and diet-related objects, providing an array of options for future studies. |
