Keyword search (4,163 papers available)

"Biancardi G" Authored Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 The Biology of Vasopressin. Sparapani S, Millet-Boureima C, Oliver J, Mu K, Hadavi P, Kalostian T, Ali N, Avelar CM, Bardies M, Barrow B, Benedikt M, Biancardi G, Bindra R, Bui L, Chihab Z, Cossitt A, Costa J, Daigneault T, Dault J, Davidson I, Dias J, Dufour E, El-Khoury S, Farhangdoost N, Forget A, Fox A, Gebrael M, Gentile MC, Geraci O, Gnanapragasam A, Gomah E, Haber E, Hamel C, Iyanker T, Kalantzis C, Kamali S, Kassardjian E, Kontos HK, Le TBU, LoScerbo D, Low YF, Mac Rae D, Maurer F, Mazhar S, Nguyen A, Nguyen-Duong K, Osborne-L 33477721
BIOLOGY
2 Behavioral Indices of Neuropsychological Processing Implicated in Moral Domain Reasoning amongst Children and Adolescents. Caravita SCS, Astrologo L, Biancardi G, Antonietti A 31757078
PSYCHOLOGY

 

Title:Behavioral Indices of Neuropsychological Processing Implicated in Moral Domain Reasoning amongst Children and Adolescents.
Authors:Caravita SCSAstrologo LBiancardi GAntonietti A
Link:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31757078?dopt=Abstract
DOI:10.3390/brainsci9120331
Publication:Brain sciences
Keywords:adolescentsage-related differencesbehavioral indiceschildrenmoral domainsmoral reasoningsocio-conventionality
PMID:31757078 Category:Brain Sci Date Added:2019-11-24
Dept Affiliation: PSYCHOLOGY
1 Department of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 20123 Milano, Italy.
2 Department of Clinical Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC H3G 1M8, Canada.

Description:

Behavioral Indices of Neuropsychological Processing Implicated in Moral Domain Reasoning amongst Children and Adolescents.

Brain Sci. 2019 Nov 20;9(12):

Authors: Caravita SCS, Astrologo L, Biancardi G, Antonietti A

Abstract

Moral domain theory posits that moral knowledge is organized in separate domains related to moral and socio-conventional rules, with the latter being reliant on a statement made by authority. Domains may be contingent on different neuropsychological processing that may vary with age. Behavioral indices were measured in three age groups, to detect differences in the neuropsychological processing allegedly involved in the evaluation of rule transgressions in different domains. Acceptance of the transgressions was also investigated. Twenty-four children, 32 early adolescents, and 31 adolescents judged acceptability of rule transgressions when an authority figure allowed the transgression. Across age, moral-rule transgressions were less accepted and took significantly longer to be evaluated. In evaluating moral rule scenarios, children had the longest reaction times. Older adolescents took the least amount of time evaluating socio-conventional rule scenarios. Results suggest differences in the neuropsychological processing underlying decision making for moral and socio-conventional domains and that rule comprehension and distinction amongst domains increase by age.

PMID: 31757078 [PubMed]





BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University