Keyword search (4,164 papers available)

"Bolenz F" Authored Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 Need for cognition does not account for individual differences in metacontrol of decision making Bolenz F; Profitt MF; Stechbarth F; Eppinger B; Strobel A; 35581395
PERFORM
2 Neural evidence for age-related deficits in the representation of state spaces Ruel A; Bolenz F; Li SC; Fischer A; Eppinger B; 35510942
PERFORM
3 Valence bias in metacontrol of decision making in adolescents and young adults Bolenz F; Eppinger B; 34655226
PERFORM
4 Seizing the opportunity: Lifespan differences in the effects of the opportunity cost of time on cognitive control Devine S; Neumann C; Otto AR; Bolenz F; Reiter A; Eppinger B; 34384965
PERFORM
5 Metacontrol of decision-making strategies in human aging. Bolenz F, Kool W, Reiter AM, Eppinger B 31397670
PERFORM
6 Developmental Changes in Learning: Computational Mechanisms and Social Influences. Bolenz F, Reiter AMF, Eppinger B 29250006
PERFORM

 

Title:Valence bias in metacontrol of decision making in adolescents and young adults
Authors:Bolenz FEppinger B
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34655226/
DOI:10.1111/cdev.13693
Publication:Child development
Keywords:
PMID:34655226 Category: Date Added:2021-10-17
Dept Affiliation: PERFORM
1 Faculty of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
2 Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
3 Cluster of Excellence "Science of Intelligence", Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
4 Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
5 PERFORM centre, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Description:

The development of metacontrol of decision making and its susceptibility to framing effects were investigated in a sample of 201 adolescents and adults in Germany (12-25 years, 111 female, ethnicity not recorded). In a task that dissociates model-free and model-based decision making, outcome magnitude and outcome valence were manipulated. Both adolescents and adults showed metacontrol and metacontrol tended to increase across adolescence. Furthermore, model-based decision making was more pronounced for loss compared to gain frames but there was no evidence that this framing effect differed with age. Thus, the strategic adaptation of decision making continues to develop into young adulthood and for both adolescents and adults, losses increase the motivation to invest cognitive resources into an effortful decision-making strategy.





BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University