Keyword search (4,164 papers available)

"Bosquet L" Authored Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 Multiple routes to help you roam: A comparison of training interventions to improve cognitive-motor dual-tasking in healthy older adults Downey R; Bherer L; Pothier K; Vrinceanu T; Intzandt B; Berryman N; Lussier M; Vincent T; Karelis AD; Nigam A; Vu TTM; Bosquet L; Li KZH; 36408116
PERFORM
2 A comparison of the effect of physical activity and cognitive training on dual-task performance in older adults Vrinceanu T; Blanchette CA; Intzandt B; Lussier M; Pothier K; Vu TTM; Nigam A; Bosquet L; Karelis AD; Li KZH; Berryman N; Bherer L; 34865009
PERFORM
3 A comparison of physical exercise and cognitive training interventions to improve determinants of functional mobility in healthy older adults Pothier K; Vrinceanu T; Intzandt B; Bosquet L; Karelis AD; Lussier M; Vu TTM; Nigam A; Li KZH; Berryman N; Bherer L; 33774144
PERFORM
4 Synergistic effects of cognitive training and physical exercise on dual-task performance in older adults Bherer L; Gagnon C; Langeard A; Lussier M; Desjardins-Crépeau L; Berryman N; Bosquet L; Vu TTM; Fraser S; Li KZH; Kramer AF; 32803232
PERFORM
5 Gross Motor Skills Training Leads to Increased Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Levels in Healthy Older Adults: A Pilot Study. Grégoire CA, Berryman N, St-Onge F, Vu TTM, Bosquet L, Arbour N, Bherer L 31031639
PERFORM
6 Relationships between lower body strength and the energy cost of treadmill walking in a cohort of healthy older adults: a cross-sectional analysis. Berryman N, Bherer L, Nadeau S, Lauzière S, Lehr L, Bobeuf F, Kergoat MJ, Vu TT, Bosquet L 27815704
PERFORM
7 The relationship between exercise intensity, cerebral oxygenation and cognitive performance in young adults. Mekari S, Fraser S, Bosquet L, Bonnéry C, Labelle V, Pouliot P, Lesage F, Bherer L 26063061
PERFORM
8 A comparison of the impact of physical exercise, cognitive training and combined intervention on spontaneous walking speed in older adults. Pothier K, Gagnon C, Fraser SA, Lussier M, Desjardins-Crépeau L, Berryman N, Kergoat MJ, Vu TTM, Li KZH, Bosquet L, Bherer L 29235076
PERFORM

 

Title:A comparison of physical exercise and cognitive training interventions to improve determinants of functional mobility in healthy older adults
Authors:Pothier KVrinceanu TIntzandt BBosquet LKarelis ADLussier MVu TTMNigam ALi KZHBerryman NBherer L
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33774144/
DOI:10.1016/j.exger.2021.111331
Publication:Experimental gerontology
Keywords:Aerobic trainingCognitive switching abilitiesComputerized cognitive trainingGross motor abilitiesTimed-up and go test
PMID:33774144 Category: Date Added:2021-03-29
Dept Affiliation: PERFORM
1 Research Centre, Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Montréal, Canada; PERFORM Centre, Concordia University, Montréal, Canada; EA 2114, Psychologie des Âges de la Vie et Adaptation, University of Tours, Tours, France. Electronic address: kpothier@univ-tours.fr.
2 Research Centre, Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Montréal, Canada; Research Centre, Montreal Heart Institute, Montréal, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
3 Research Centre, Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Montréal, Canada; PERFORM Centre, Concordia University, Montréal, Canada; Research Centre, Montreal Heart Institute, Montréal, Canada.
4 Laboratory MOVE (EA 6314), Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
5 Research Centre, Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Montréal, Canada; Département des Sciences de l'Activité Physique, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
6 Research Centre, Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Montréal, Canada; Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
7 Department of Medicine, University of Montréal, Montréal, Canada; Research Centre, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
8 Research Centre, Montreal Heart Institute, Montréal, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
9 PERFORM Centre, Concordia University, Montréal, Canada; Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Centre for Research in Human Development, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
10 Research Centre, Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Montréal, Canada; Laboratory MOVE (EA 6314), Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Poitiers, Poitiers, France; Département des Sciences de l'Activité Physique, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada; Department of Sports Studies, Bishop's University, Sherbrooke, Canada.
11 Research Centre, Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Montréal, Canada; PERFORM Centre, Concordia University, Montréal, Canada; Research Centre, Montreal Heart Institute, Montréal, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Montréal, Montréal, Canada. Electronic address: louis.bherer@umontreal.ca.

Description:

Objectives: Mobility is a complex but crucial clinical outcome in older adults. Past observational studies have highlighted that cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), energy cost of walking (ECW), and cognitive switching abilities are associated with mobility performance, making these key determinants of mobility intervention targets to enhance mobility in older adults. The objective of this study was to compare, in the same design, the impact of three training methods - each known to improve either CRF, ECW, or cognitive switching abilities - on mobility in healthy older adults.

Methods: Seventy-eight participants (69.28 ± 4.85yo) were randomly assigned to one of three twelve-week interventions: Aerobic Exercise (AE; n = 26), Gross Motor Abilities (GMA; n = 27), or Cognitive (COG; n = 25) training. Each intervention was designed to improve one of the three key determinants of mobility (CRF, ECW, and cognitive switching). Primary outcomes (usual gait speed, and TUG performance) and the three mobility determinants were measured before and after the intervention.

Results: Repeated-measures ANOVAs showed a time effect for TUG performance (F(1,75) = 14.92, p < .001): all groups equally improved after the intervention (?TUGpost-pre, in seconds, with 95% CI: AE = -0.44 [-0.81 to -0.08]; GMA = -0.60 [-1.10 to -0.10]; COG = -0.33 [-0.71 to 0.05]). No significant between group differences were observed. CRF was improved in the AE group only (Hedges' G = 0.27, small effect), ECW and cognitive switching improved the most in the GMA (Hedges' G = -0.78, moderate effect) and COG groups (Hedges' G = -1.93, large effect) respectively. Smaller improvements in ECW were observed following AE and COG trainings (Hedges' G: AE = -0.39, COG = -0.36, both small effects) as well as in cognitive switching following AE and GMA training (Hedges' G: AE = -0.42, GMA = -0.21, both small effects).

Discussion: This study provides further support to the notion that multiple interventional approaches (aerobic, gross motor exercise, or cognitive training) can be employed to improve functional mobility in older adults, giving them, and professionals, more options to promote healthy ageing.





BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University