Keyword search (4,163 papers available)

"Radomsky AS" Authored Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 Reappraising beliefs about losing control: An experimental investigation Fridgen CPEA; Radomsky AS; 39837217
PSYCHOLOGY
2 Further analyses of appraisals of losing control and other OCD-related cognitions: A quasi-experimental investigation Sandstrom A; Radomsky AS; 39626976
PSYCHOLOGY
3 Update and validation of the Beliefs about Losing Control Inventory-II (BALCI-II): a psychometric investigation Kelly-Turner K; Radomsky AS; 39373713
PSYCHOLOGY
4 Development and psychometric evaluation of the Violation Appraisal Measure (VAM) Krause S; Radomsky AS; 39206950
PSYCHOLOGY
5 'Things that shouldn't be': a qualitative investigation of violation-related appraisals in individuals with OCD and/or trauma histories Krause S; Radomsky AS; 38679952
PSYCHOLOGY
6 At the mercy of myself: A thematic analysis of beliefs about losing control Kelly-Turner K; Radomsky AS; 38131416
PSYCHOLOGY
7 What's control got to do with it? A systematic review of control beliefs in obsessive-compulsive disorder Sandstrom A; Krause S; Ouellet-Courtois C; Kelly-Turner K; Radomsky AS; 38091769
PSYCHOLOGY
8 Beliefs about losing control and other OCD-related cognitions: An experimental investigation Sandstrom A; Radomsky AS; 37948951
PSYCHOLOGY
9 Putting things right: An experimental investigation of memory biases related to symmetry, ordering and arranging behaviour Radomsky AS; Ouellet-Courtois C; Golden E; Senn JM; Parrish CL; 37793286
PSYCHOLOGY
10 An Experimental Investigation of Moral Self-Violation and Mental Contamination Krause S; Radomsky AS; 37363745
PSYCHOLOGY
11 Can immorality be contracted? Appraisals of moral disgust and contamination fear Ouellet-Courtois C; Radomsky AS; 37270955
PSYCHOLOGY
12 Always Saying the Wrong Thing: Negative Beliefs About Losing Control Cause Symptoms of Social Anxiety Kelly-Turner K; Radomsky AS; 36117751
PSYCHOLOGY
13 Stanley 'Jack' Rachman (1934-2021) Radomsky AS; Shafran R; Whittal ML; 34560413
CONCORDIA
14 Development and validation of the multidimensional version of the Fear of Self Questionnaire: Corrupted, culpable and malformed feared possible selves in obsessive-compulsive and body-dysmorphic symptoms. Aardema F, Radomsky AS, Moulding R, Wong SF, Bourguignon L, Giraldo-O'Meara M 33547834
PSYCHOLOGY
15 "Was I asking for it?": An experimental investigation of perceived responsibility, mental contamination and workplace sexual harassment. Krause S, Radomsky AS 33321247
PSYCHOLOGY
16 The Covert and Overt Reassurance Seeking Inventory (CORSI): Development, validation and psychometric analyses. Radomsky AS, Neal RL, Parrish CL, Lavoie SL, Schell SE 33046164
CONCORDIA
17 Prediction Errors in Depression: A Quasi-Experimental Analysis. Radomsky AS, Wong SF, Dussault D, Gilchrist PT, Tesolin SB 32746394
PSYCHOLOGY
18 Hoping for more: How cognitive science has and hasn't been helpful to the OCD clinician. Ouimet AJ, Ashbaugh AR, Radomsky AS 29673581
PSYCHOLOGY
19 Cognitive therapy for compulsive checking in obsessive-compulsive disorder: A pilot trial. Radomsky AS, Giraldo-O'Meara M, Wong SF, Dugas MJ, Gelfand LA, Rachman S, Schell S, Senn JM, Shafran R, Whittal ML 32070838
PSYCHOLOGY
20 Beliefs about losing control, obsessions, and caution: An experimental investigation. Gagné JP, Radomsky AS 32045733
PSYCHOLOGY
21 What do you really need? Self- and partner-reported intervention preferences within cognitive behavioural therapy for reassurance seeking behaviour. Neal RL, Radomsky AS 31495351
PSYCHOLOGY
22 When it's at: An examination of when cognitive change occurs during cognitive therapy for compulsive checking in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Radomsky AS, Wong SF, Giraldo-O'Meara M, Dugas MJ, Gelfand LA, Myhr G, Schell SE, Senn JM, Shafran R, Whittal ML 30573211
PSYCHOLOGY
23 The development and validation of the Beliefs About Losing Control Inventory (BALCI). Radomsky AS, Gagné JP 31140370
PSYCHOLOGY

 

Title:What do you really need? Self- and partner-reported intervention preferences within cognitive behavioural therapy for reassurance seeking behaviour.
Authors:Neal RLRadomsky AS
Link:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31495351?dopt=Abstract
DOI:10.1017/S135246581900050X
Publication:Behavioural and cognitive psychotherapy
Keywords:acceptabilitycognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)intervention preferenceobsessive compulsive disorder (OCD)partnersreassurance seeking
PMID:31495351 Category:Behav Cogn Psychother Date Added:2019-09-10
Dept Affiliation: PSYCHOLOGY
1 Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montréal, Canada.

Description:

What do you really need? Self- and partner-reported intervention preferences within cognitive behavioural therapy for reassurance seeking behaviour.

Behav Cogn Psychother. 2019 Sep 09;:1-13

Authors: Neal RL, Radomsky AS

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reassurance seeking (RS) in obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) is commonly addressed in cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) using a technique called reducing accommodation. Reducing accommodation is a behaviourally based CBT intervention that may be effective; however, there is a lack of controlled research on its use and acceptability to clients/patients, and case studies suggest that it can be associated with negative emotional/behavioural consequences. Providing support to encourage coping with distress is a cognitively based CBT intervention that may be an effective alternative, but lacks evidence regarding its acceptability.

AIMS: This study aimed to determine whether support provision may be a more acceptable/endorsed CBT intervention for RS than a strict reducing accommodation approach.

METHOD: Participants and familiar partners (N = 179) read vignette descriptions of accommodation reduction and support interventions, and responded to measures of perceived intervention acceptability/adhereability and endorsement, before completing a forced-choice preference task.

RESULTS: Overall, findings suggested that participants and partners gave significantly higher ratings for the support than the accommodation reduction intervention (partial ?2 = .049 to .321). Participants and partners also both selected the support intervention more often than the traditional reducing accommodation intervention when given the choice.

CONCLUSIONS: Support provision is perceived as an acceptable CBT intervention for RS by participants and their familiar partners. These results have implications for cognitive behavioural theory and practice related to RS.

PMID: 31495351 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]





BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University