BookR: School of Health Core Facilities Booking
PubMed Publications| Keyword search (4,163 papers available) |  |
"Ribeiro PAB" Authored Publications:
| Title | Authors | PubMed ID | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Addressing vaccine hesitancy: A systematic review comparing the efficacy of motivational versus educational interventions on vaccination uptake | Labbé S; Bacon SL; Wu N; Ribeiro PAB; Boucher VG; Stojanovic J; Voisard B; Deslauriers F; Tremblay N; Hébert-Auger L; Lavoie KL; | 40167044 HKAP |
| 2 | Identifying priority questions regarding rapid systematic reviews' methods: protocol for an eDelphi study | Vieira AM; Szczepanik G; de Waure C; Tricco AC; Oliver S; Stojanovic J; Ribeiro PAB; Pollock D; Akl EA; Lavis J; Kuchenmuller T; Bragge P; Langer L; Bacon S; | 37419644 HKAP |
| 3 | Methods to assess ambivalence towards food and diet: a scoping review | Hayashi D; Carvalho SDL; Ribeiro PAB; Rodrigues RCM; São-João TM; Lavoie K; Bacon S; Cornélio ME; | 37226601 HKAP |
| 4 | Long-term effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against infections, hospitalisations, and mortality in adults: findings from a rapid living systematic evidence synthesis and meta-analysis up to December, 2022 | Wu N; Joyal-Desmarais K; Ribeiro PAB; Vieira AM; Stojanovic J; Sanuade C; Yip D; Bacon SL; | 36780914 HKAP |
| 5 | Methods to assess ambivalence towards food and diet: a scoping review protocol | Hayashi Neto D; Carvalho SDL; Ribeiro PAB; Lavoie KL; Bacon SL; Cornélio ME; | 34812190 HKAP |
| 6 | Immediate physiological effects of acute electronic cigarette use in humans: A systematic review and meta-analysis | Larue F; Tasbih T; Ribeiro PAB; Lavoie KL; Dolan E; Bacon SL; | 34808583 HKAP |
| 7 | Global Trends and Correlates of COVID-19 Vaccination Hesitancy: Findings from the iCARE Study | Stojanovic J; Boucher VG; Gagne M; Gupta S; Joyal-Desmarais K; Paduano S; Aburub AS; Sheinfeld Gorin SN; Kassianos AP; Ribeiro PAB; Bacon SL; Lavoie KL; | 34204379 HKAP |
| 8 | Behavioral weight management interventions in metabolic and bariatric surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis investigating optimal delivery timing. | Julien CA, Lavoie KL, Ribeiro PAB, Dragomir AI, Mercier LA, Garneau PY, Pescarus R, Bacon SL | 33403754 HKAP |
| Title: | Methods to assess ambivalence towards food and diet: a scoping review | ||||
| Authors: | Hayashi D, Carvalho SDL, Ribeiro PAB, Rodrigues RCM, São-João TM, Lavoie K, Bacon S, Cornélio ME | ||||
| Link: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37226601/ | ||||
| DOI: | 10.1111/jhn.13192 | ||||
| Publication: | Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association | ||||
| Keywords: | attitudinal ambivalence; diet; eating behaviour; food; review; | ||||
| PMID: | 37226601 | Category: | Date Added: | 2023-05-25 | |
| Dept Affiliation: |
HKAP
1 School of Nursing (FEnf), University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. 2 Montreal Behavioural Medicine Centre (MBMC), Montreal, CIUSSS-NIM, Quebec, Canada. 3 College of Nursing, University of Rhode Island, Providence, Rhode Island, USA. 4 Department of Psychology, University of Quebec at Montreal (UQAM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 5 Department of Health, Kinesiology, and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. |
||||
Description: |
Background: Ambivalence towards food and diet, which favours behavioural inertia, might be a barrier to adopting healthier eating behaviours. Measuring it can help researchers to better understand its relationship with behaviour change and design interventions aimed at resolving it. In this scoping review, we map and describe methods and tools employed in studies to assess, measure or classify the ambivalence of participants towards food- and diet-related attitude objects. Methods: In accordance with Joanna Briggs Institute guidance for conducting scoping reviews, we retrieved peer-reviewed studies from MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, FSTA and Food Science Source and preprints from PsyArXiv and MedRxiv. Two independent reviewers screened the articles. We considered for inclusion peer-reviewed studies and preprints that assessed the ambivalence of participants of any age, sex or sociodemographic group towards food and diet. Results: We included 45 studies published between 1992 and 2022, which included participants from 17 countries. Eighteen methods were employed across the included studies to assess different types of ambivalence (felt, potential or cognitive-affective), the most frequent of which were the Griffin Index, the Subjective Ambivalence Questionnaire, the MouseTracker Paradigm and the Orientation to Chocolate Questionnaire. Conclusion: This scoping review identified several methods and tools to assess different types of ambivalence towards food- and diet-related objects, providing an array of options for future studies. |
