Keyword search (4,163 papers available)

"Roy A" Authored Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 Season and city shape urban bioaerosol composition beyond vegetation and socioeconomic gradients Poirier S; Rondeau-Leclaire J; Faticov M; Roy A; Lajeunesse G; Lucier JF; Tardif S; Kembel SW; Ziter C; Laprise C; Paquette A; Girard C; Laforest-Lapointe I; 41785576
BIOLOGY
2 Seasonal Changes in Lumbar Multifidus Muscle in University Rugby Players. Roy A, Rivaz H, Rizk A, Frenette S, Boily M, Fortin M 32925493
PERFORM

 

Title:Seasonal Changes in Lumbar Multifidus Muscle in University Rugby Players.
Authors:Roy ARivaz HRizk AFrenette SBoily MFortin M
Link:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32925493
DOI:10.1249/MSS.0000000000002514
Publication:Medicine and science in sports and exercise
Keywords:
PMID:32925493 Category:Med Sci Sports Exerc Date Added:2020-09-15
Dept Affiliation: PERFORM
1 Department Health Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, CANADA.
2 PERFORM Centre, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, CANADA.

Description:

Seasonal Changes in Lumbar Multifidus Muscle in University Rugby Players.

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020 Sep 11; :

Authors: Roy A, Rivaz H, Rizk A, Frenette S, Boily M, Fortin M

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although smaller lumbar multifidus muscle (LMM) was reported to be a strong predictor of lower limb injury (LLI) in Australian Football League (AFL) players, LMM morphology has not been investigated in rugby athletes. This study examined seasonal changes in LMM in rugby players and whether LMM characteristics were associated with low back pain (LBP) and LLI.

METHODS: Ultrasound examinations of the LMM were acquired in 21 university level rugby players (12 females, 9 males) at preseason and end-season. LMM cross-sectional area (CSA), thickness at rest, and thickness during submaximal contraction (e.g. contralateral arm lift) measurements in prone and standing were obtained bilaterally at the L5-S1 level. The percent change in LMM thickness during contraction was calculated as: [(thicknesscontracted- thicknessrest)/thicknessrest x 100]. Self-reported questionnaires were used to acquire data on LBP and LLI.

RESULTS: There was no significant difference in LMM characteristics between preseason and end-season measurements (p>0.05). Preseason LMM CSA, side-to-side CSA asymmetry, thickness at rest or during contraction were not associated with LBP or LLI. However, a lower % thickness change in the standing position was significantly associated with having LBP during the preseason (p=0.01) and playing season (p=0.001), as well as LLI during the preseason (p=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS: This study provides preliminary evidence that LMM contractile ability and behavior during functional movement, such as standing, may have important implications for the susceptibility to injury among rugby athletes.

PMID: 32925493 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]





BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University