Keyword search (4,164 papers available)

"Stojanovic J" Authored Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 Addressing vaccine hesitancy: A systematic review comparing the efficacy of motivational versus educational interventions on vaccination uptake Labbé S; Bacon SL; Wu N; Ribeiro PAB; Boucher VG; Stojanovic J; Voisard B; Deslauriers F; Tremblay N; Hébert-Auger L; Lavoie KL; 40167044
HKAP
2 Understanding the Components of Eating Behaviour-Focused Weight Management Interventions Adjunct to Metabolic Bariatric Surgery: Systematic Review of Published Literature Yousefi R; Ben-Porat T; O' Neill J; Boucher VG; Stojanovic J; Fortin A; Lavoie KL; Bacon SL; 39753946
HKAP
3 Identifying priority questions regarding rapid systematic reviews' methods: protocol for an eDelphi study Vieira AM; Szczepanik G; de Waure C; Tricco AC; Oliver S; Stojanovic J; Ribeiro PAB; Pollock D; Akl EA; Lavis J; Kuchenmuller T; Bragge P; Langer L; Bacon S; 37419644
HKAP
4 Long-term effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against infections, hospitalisations, and mortality in adults: findings from a rapid living systematic evidence synthesis and meta-analysis up to December, 2022 Wu N; Joyal-Desmarais K; Ribeiro PAB; Vieira AM; Stojanovic J; Sanuade C; Yip D; Bacon SL; 36780914
HKAP
5 How well do covariates perform when adjusting for sampling bias in online COVID-19 research? Insights from multiverse analyses Joyal-Desmarais K; Stojanovic J; Kennedy EB; Enticott JC; Boucher VG; Vo H; Košir U; Lavoie KL; Bacon SL; 36335560
HKAP
6 Survey of Professionals of the European Public Health Association (EUPHA) towards Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Beccia F; Hoxhaj I; Sassano M; Stojanovic J; Acampora A; Pastorino R; Boccia S; 36179240
HKAP
7 Understanding national trends in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Canada: results from five sequential cross-sectional representative surveys spanning April 2020-March 2021 Lavoie K; Gosselin-Boucher V; Stojanovic J; Gupta S; Gagné M; Joyal-Desmarais K; Séguin K; Gorin SS; Ribeiro P; Voisard B; Vallis M; Corace K; Presseau J; Bacon S; 35383087
HKAP
8 Food Addiction and Binge Eating Impact on Weight Loss Outcomes Two Years Following Sleeve Gastrectomy Surgery Ben-Porat T; Košir U; Peretz S; Sherf-Dagan S; Stojanovic J; Sakran N; 35048249
HKAP
9 Public perceptions and behavioural responses to the first COVID-19 pandemic wave in Italy: Results from the iCARE study Stojanovic J; Raparelli V; Boccia S; Bacon SL; Lavoie KL; 34406384
HKAP
10 Coding Public Health Interventions for Health Technology Assessments: A Pilot Experience With WHO's International Classification of Health Interventions (ICHI) Wübbeler M; Geis S; Stojanovic J; Elliott L; Gutierrez-Ibarluzea I; Lenoir-Wijnkoop I; 34222165
HKAP
11 Global Trends and Correlates of COVID-19 Vaccination Hesitancy: Findings from the iCARE Study Stojanovic J; Boucher VG; Gagne M; Gupta S; Joyal-Desmarais K; Paduano S; Aburub AS; Sheinfeld Gorin SN; Kassianos AP; Ribeiro PAB; Bacon SL; Lavoie KL; 34204379
HKAP
12 Core Competencies in Cancer Genomics for Healthcare Professionals: Results From a Systematic Literature Review and a Delphi Process. Hoxhaj I, Tognetto A, Acampora A, Stojanovic J, Boccia S 33442861
HKAP
13 Adult height and risk of gastric cancer: a pooled analysis within the Stomach cancer Pooling Project. Giraldi L, Stojanovic J, Arzani D, Persiani R, Hu J, Johnson KC, Zhang ZF, Ferraroni M, Palli D, Yu GP, La Vecchia C, Pelucchi C, Lunet N, Ferro A, Malekzadeh R, Muscat J, Zaridze D, Maximovich D, Aragones N, Martin V, Vioque J, Navarrete-Munoz EM, Pakseresht M, Negri E, Rota M, Pourfarzi F, Mu L, Kurtz RC, Lagiou A, Lagiou P, Pastorino R, Boccia S 32925512
HKAP
14 Evaluating Public Health Interventions: A Neglected Area in Health Technology Assessment. Stojanovic J, Wübbeler M, Geis S, Reviriego E, Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea I, Lenoir-Wijnkoop I 32391300
HKAP
15 European citizens' perspectives on direct-to-consumer genetic testing: an updated systematic review. Hoxhaj I, Stojanovic J, Boccia S 32361734
HKAP
16 A review of the legislation of direct-to-consumer genetic testing in EU member states. Hoxhaj I, Stojanovic J, Sassano M, Acampora A, Boccia S 31923586
HKAP

 

Title:Evaluating Public Health Interventions: A Neglected Area in Health Technology Assessment.
Authors:Stojanovic JWübbeler MGeis SReviriego EGutiérrez-Ibarluzea ILenoir-Wijnkoop I
Link:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32391300?dopt=Abstract
DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2020.00106
Publication:Frontiers in public health
Keywords:HTAat-risk populationsinterventionlifestyle and behaviorpublic healthsurveytechnology
PMID:32391300 Category:Front Public Health Date Added:2020-05-12
Dept Affiliation: HKAP
1 Department of Health, Kinesiology, and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
2 Montreal Behavioural Medicine Centre, CIUSSS du Nord-De-L'Île-De-Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
3 Department of Nursing Science, Hochschule für Gesundheit-University of Applied Sciences, Bochum, Germany.
4 Osteba, Basque Office for Technology Assessment, Basque Foundation for Health Innovation and Research (BIOEF), Bilbao, Spain.
5 Basque Foundation for Health Innovation and Research (BIOEF), Bilbao, Spain.
6 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Description:

Evaluating Public Health Interventions: A Neglected Area in Health Technology Assessment.

Front Public Health. 2020;8:106

Authors: Stojanovic J, Wübbeler M, Geis S, Reviriego E, Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea I, Lenoir-Wijnkoop I

Abstract

Introduction: Public health (PH) interventions are crucial for ensuring sustainable healthcare services. Nevertheless, they represent a neglected area in the field of health technology assessment (HTA) due to various methodological issues and their complex design that goes beyond clinical setting. The present study provides an environmental scan of HTA initiatives related to the assessment of PH technologies on a global level. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey among 85 HTA-related European and international societies, health bodies, and networks from September 2018 to January 2019. The questionnaire contained four sections and 18 questions regarding activities related to the evaluation of PH technologies, information on existing PH technologies, and methodologies of assessment as well as barriers and facilitators to reaching a decision and implementing a PH technology. Results: Among 52 survey responses, the majority of the respondents came from European countries (35%), followed by North American (27%), and South American (19%) countries. The main type of organizations covered by our survey included HTA agencies, public administrations, and research institutes. Seventy-one % of the institutions reported engagement in any aspect of HTA in the area of PH (N = 37). Among those, 81% evaluated less than 5 PH technologies from 2013 to 2018. The most common barriers for reaching a decision on PH technologies were lack of data, conflicting stakeholder priorities, and methodological issues. A total of 76 PH interventions were reported, and most cited initiatives were related to chronic disease screening, prevention of infectious diseases, and maternal, prenatal, and neonatal screening. Conclusion: Our survey reported a rather limited involvement of HTA in the evaluation of PH technologies. In particular, an evaluation of behavioral and lifestyle interventions remains extremely rare. The implementation of collaborative HTA approaches in the setting of PH practice and policy needs to be prioritized and further strengthened. Moreover, ensuring reliable data structures and consolidation of HTA methods for the evaluation of PH technologies will be crucial for tackling the enormous burden of non-communicable diseases in societies.

PMID: 32391300 [PubMed]





BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University