BookR: School of Health Core Facilities Booking
PubMed Publications| Keyword search (4,164 papers available) |  |
"Accuracy" Keyword-tagged Publications:
| Title | Authors | PubMed ID | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Are MEDLINE searches sufficient for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the diagnostic accuracy of depression screening tools? A review of meta-analyses | Rice DB; Kloda LA; Levis B; Qi B; Kingsland E; Thombs BD; | 27411746 LIBRARY |
| 2 | Reporting quality in abstracts of meta-analyses of depression screening tool accuracy: a review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses | Rice DB; Kloda LA; Shrier I; Thombs BD; | 27864250 LIBRARY |
| 3 | Class imbalance should not throw you off balance: Choosing the right classifiers and performance metrics for brain decoding with imbalanced data | Thölke P; Mantilla-Ramos YJ; Abdelhedi H; Maschke C; Dehgan A; Harel Y; Kemtur A; Mekki Berrada L; Sahraoui M; Young T; Bellemare Pépin A; El Khantour C; Landry M; Pascarella A; Hadid V; Combrisson E; O' Byrne J; Jerbi K; | 37385392 IMAGING |
| 4 | How uncertainty affects information search among consumers: a curvilinear perspective | He S; Rucker DD; | 36471868 JMSB |
| 5 | Transparency and completeness of reporting of depression screening tool accuracy studies: A meta-research review of adherence to the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies statement | Nassar EL; Levis B; Neyer MA; Rice DB; Booij L; Benedetti A; Thombs BD; | 36047034 PSYCHOLOGY |
| 6 | Sample size and precision of estimates in studies of depression screening tool accuracy: A meta-research review of studies published in 2018-2021 | Nassar EL; Levis B; Neyer MA; Rice DB; Booij L; Benedetti A; Thombs BD; | 35362161 PSYCHOLOGY |
| 7 | Inclusion of currently diagnosed or treated individuals in studies of depression screening tool accuracy: a meta-research review of studies published in 2018-2021 | Nassar EL; Levis B; Rice DB; Booij L; Benedetti A; Thombs BD; | 35334411 PSYCHOLOGY |
| 8 | A Simulation Toolkit for Testing the Sensitivity and Accuracy of Corticometry Pipelines | OmidYeganeh M; Khalili-Mahani N; Bermudez P; Ross A; Lepage C; Vincent RD; Jeon S; Lewis LB; Das S; Zijdenbos AP; Rioux P; Adalat R; Van Eede MC; Evans AC; | 34381348 PERFORM |
| 9 | Data-driven methods distort optimal cutoffs and accuracy estimates of depression screening tools: a simulation study using individual participant data | Bhandari PM; Levis B; Neupane D; Patten SB; Shrier I; Thombs BD; Benedetti A; | 33838273 CONCORDIA |
| 10 | Equivalency of the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis | Wu Y; Levis B; Riehm KE; Saadat N; Levis AW; Azar M; Rice DB; Boruff J; Cuijpers P; Gilbody S; Ioannidis JPA; Kloda LA; McMillan D; Patten SB; Shrier I; Ziegelstein RC; Akena DH; Arroll B; Ayalon L; Baradaran HR; Baron M; Bombardier CH; Butterworth P; Carter G; Chagas MH; Chan JCN; Cholera R; Conwell Y; de Man-van Ginkel JM; Fann JR; Fischer FH; Fung D; Gelaye B; Goodyear-Smith F; Greeno CG; Hall BJ; Harrison PA; Härter M; Hegerl U; Hides L; Hobfoll SE; Hudson M; Hyphantis T; Inagaki M; Jetté N; Khamseh ME; Kiely KM; Kwan Y; Lamers F; Liu SI; Lotrakul M; Loureiro SR; Löwe B; McGuire A; Mohd-Sidik S; Munhoz TN; Muramatsu K; Osório FL; Patel V; Pence BW; Persoons P; Picardi A; Reuter K; Rooney AG; Santos IS; Shaaban J; Sidebottom A; Simning A; Stafford L; Sung S; Tan PLL; Turner A; van Weert HC; White J; Whooley MA; Winkley K; Yamada M; Benedetti A; Thombs BD; | 31298180 LIBRARY |
| 11 | Diagnostic accuracy of the Depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D) for detecting major depression: protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analyses. | Thombs BD, Benedetti A, Kloda LA, Levis B, Azar M, Riehm KE, Saadat N, Cuijpers P, Gilbody S, Ioannidis JP, McMillan D, Patten SB, Shrier I, Steele RJ, Ziegelstein RC, Loiselle CG, Henry M, Ismail Z, Mitchell N, Tonelli M | 27075844 LIBRARY |
| 12 | Gesture-based registration correction using a mobile augmented reality image-guided neurosurgery system. | Léger É, Reyes J, Drouin S, Collins DL, Popa T, Kersten-Oertel M | 30800320 PERFORM |
| Title: | Sample size and precision of estimates in studies of depression screening tool accuracy: A meta-research review of studies published in 2018-2021 | ||||
| Authors: | Nassar EL, Levis B, Neyer MA, Rice DB, Booij L, Benedetti A, Thombs BD | ||||
| Link: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35362161/ | ||||
| DOI: | 10.1002/mpr.1910 | ||||
| Publication: | International journal of methods in psychiatric research | ||||
| Keywords: | bias; depression; diagnostic test accuracy; sample size; screening; | ||||
| PMID: | 35362161 | Category: | Date Added: | 2022-04-01 | |
| Dept Affiliation: |
PSYCHOLOGY
1 Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 2 Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 3 Centre for Prognosis Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK. 4 Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 5 Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 6 Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 7 CHU Sainte-Justine Hospital Research Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 8 Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 9 Respiratory Epidemiology and Clinical Research Unit, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 10 Department of Educational and Counselling |
||||
Description: |
Objectives: Depression screening tool accuracy studies should be conducted with large enough sample sizes to generate precise accuracy estimates. We assessed the proportion of recently published depression screening tool diagnostic accuracy studies that reported sample size calculations; the proportion that provided confidence intervals (CIs); and precision, based on the width and lower bounds of 95% CIs for sensitivity and specificity. In addition, we assessed whether these results have improved since a previous review of studies published in 2013-2015. Methods: MEDLINE was searched from January 1, 2018, through May 21, 2021. Results: Twelve of 106 primary studies (11%) described a viable sample size calculation, which represented an improvement of 8% since the last review. Thirty-six studies (34%) provided reasonably accurate CIs. Of 103 studies where 95% CIs were provided or could be calculated, seven (7%) had sensitivity CI widths of =10%, whereas 58 (56%) had widths of =21%. Eighty-four studies (82%) had lower bounds of CIs <80% for sensitivity and 77 studies (75%) for specificity. These results were similar to those reported previously. Conclusion: Few studies reported sample size calculations, and the number of included individuals in most studies was too small to generate reasonably precise accuracy estimates. |
