Keyword search (4,164 papers available)

"Amygdala" Keyword-tagged Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 What is Learned Determines How Pavlovian Conditioned Fear is Consolidated in the Brain Leake J; Leidl DM; Lay BPP; Fam JP; Giles MC; Qureshi OA; Westbrook RF; Holmes NM; 37963767
CSBN
2 NMDA Receptors in the Basolateral Amygdala Complex Are Engaged for Pavlovian Fear Conditioning When an Animal's Predictions about Danger Are in Error Tuval Keidar 37607821
CSBN
3 Danger Changes the Way the Brain Consolidates Neutral Information; and Does So by Interacting with Processes Involved in the Encoding of That Information Omar A Qureshi 36927572
PSYCHOLOGY
4 The Recruitment of a Neuronal Ensemble in the Central Nucleus of the Amygdala During the First Extinction Episode Has Persistent Effects on Extinction Expression Lay BPP; Koya E; Hope BT; Esber GR; Iordanova MD; 36336498
PSYCHOLOGY
5 Prediction error determines whether NMDA receptors in the basolateral amygdala complex are involved in Pavlovian fear conditioning Williams-Spooner MJ; Delaney AJ; Westbrook RF; Holmes NM; 35410880
PSYCHOLOGY
6 Anxiety-like behavior in female mice is modulated by STAT3 signaling in midbrain dopamine neurons Fernandes MF; Lau D; Sharma S; Fulton S; 33872705
CSBN
7 Neural substrates of appetitive and aversive prediction error. Iordanova MD, Yau JO, McDannald MA, Corbit LH 33453307
CSBN
8 Adaptive behaviour under conflict: deconstructing extinction, reversal, and active avoidance learning. Manning EE, Bradfield LA, Iordanova MD 33035525
CSBN
9 Nucleus Accumbens Cell Type- and Input-Specific Suppression of Unproductive Reward Seeking. Lafferty CK, Yang AK, Mendoza JA, Britt JP 32187545
CSBN

 

Title:Adaptive behaviour under conflict: deconstructing extinction, reversal, and active avoidance learning.
Authors:Manning EEBradfield LAIordanova MD
Link:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33035525
DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.09.030
Publication:Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews
Keywords:Active avoidanceAmygdalaConflictExtinctionPrefrontal cortexReversal
PMID:33035525 Category:Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date Added:2020-10-10
Dept Affiliation: CSBN
1 Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Suite 223, 450 Technology Drive, Pittsburgh, PA, 15224, USA; School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, University of Newcastle, MS306, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia. Electronic address: lizzie.manning@newcastle.edu.au.
2 Centre for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, University of Technology Sydney (St. Vincent's Campus), 405 Liverpool St, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia; St. Vincent's Centre for Applied Medical Research, St. Vincent's Hospital Sydney Limited, 405 Liverpool St, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia. Electronic address: Laura.Bradfield@uts.edu.au.
3 Department of Psychology/Centre for Studies in Behavioural Neurobiology, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada. Electronic address: mihaela.iordanova@concordia.ca.

Description:

Adaptive behaviour under conflict: deconstructing extinction, reversal, and active avoidance learning.

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Oct 06; :

Authors: Manning EE, Bradfield LA, Iordanova MD

Abstract

In complex environments, organisms must respond adaptively to situations despite conflicting information. Under natural (i.e. non-laboratory) circumstances, it is rare that cues or responses are consistently paired with a single outcome. Inconsistent pairings are more common, as are situations where cues and responses are associated with multiple outcomes. Such inconsistency creates conflict, and a response that is adaptive in one scenario may not be adaptive in another. Learning to adjust responses accordingly is important for species to survive and prosper. Here we review the behavioural and brain mechanisms of responding under conflict by focusing on three popular behavioural procedures: extinction, reversal learning, and active avoidance. Extinction involves adapting from reinforcement to non-reinforcement, reversal learning involves swapping the reinforcement of cues or responses, and active avoidance involves performing a response to avoid an aversive outcome, which may conflict with other defensive strategies. We note that each of these phenomena relies on somewhat overlapping neural circuits, suggesting that such circuits may be critical for the general ability to respond appropriately under conflict.

PMID: 33035525 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]





BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University