Keyword search (4,163 papers available)

"Cochlear implant" Keyword-tagged Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 Speech, Timbre, and Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implant Users With Flat-Panel CT-Based Frequency Reallocations: A Longitudinal Prospective Study Gilbert ML; Lewis RM; Deroche MLD; Jiam NT; Jiradejvong P; Mo J; Cooke DL; Limb CJ; 40689899
PSYCHOLOGY
2 The neural characteristics influencing literacy outcome in children with cochlear implants Koirala N; Manning J; Neumann S; Anderson C; Deroche MLD; Wolfe J; Pugh K; Landi N; Muthuraman M; Gracco VL; 40046341
PSYCHOLOGY
3 Cross-modal plasticity in children with cochlear implant: converging evidence from EEG and functional near-infrared spectroscopy Deroche MLD; Wolfe J; Neumann S; Manning J; Hanna L; Towler W; Wilson C; Bien AG; Miller S; Schafer E; Gemignani J; Alemi R; Muthuraman M; Koirala N; Gracco VL; 38846536
PSYCHOLOGY
4 Audiovisual integration in children with cochlear implants revealed through EEG and fNIRS Alemi R; Wolfe J; Neumann S; Manning J; Towler W; Koirala N; Gracco VL; Deroche M; 37989460
PSYCHOLOGY
5 Motor Processing in Children With Cochlear Implants as Assessed by Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Alemi R; Wolfe J; Neumann S; Manning J; Hanna L; Towler W; Wilson C; Bien A; Miller S; Schafer E; Gemignani J; Koirala N; Gracco VL; Deroche M; 37977135
PSYCHOLOGY
6 Dynamic networks differentiate the language ability of children with cochlear implants Koirala N; Deroche MLD; Wolfe J; Neumann S; Bien AG; Doan D; Goldbeck M; Muthuraman M; Gracco VL; 37409105
PSYCHOLOGY
7 Auditory evoked response to an oddball paradigm in children wearing cochlear implants Deroche MLD; Wolfe J; Neumann S; Manning J; Towler W; Alemi R; Bien AG; Koirala N; Hanna L; Henry L; Gracco VL; 36965466
PSYCHOLOGY
8 Predicting emotion perception abilities for cochlear implant users Paquette S; Deroche MLD; Goffi-Gomez MV; Hoshino ACH; Lehmann A; 36047767
PSYCHOLOGY
9 Processing of Acoustic Information in Lexical Tone Production and Perception by Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients. Deroche MLD, Lu HP, Lin YS, Chatterjee M, Peng SC 31281237
PSYCHOLOGY

 

Title:Audiovisual integration in children with cochlear implants revealed through EEG and fNIRS
Authors:Alemi RWolfe JNeumann SManning JTowler WKoirala NGracco VLDeroche M
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37989460/
DOI:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2023.110817
Publication:Brain research bulletin
Keywords:Audiovisual integrationCochlear implantCross-modal plasticityHearing loss
PMID:37989460 Category: Date Added:2023-11-22
Dept Affiliation: PSYCHOLOGY
1 Department of Psychology, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke St. West, Montreal, Quebec H4B 1R6, Canada. Electronic address: razieh.alemi@mail.concordia.ca.
2 Oberkotter Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
3 Hearts for Hearing Foundation, 11500 Portland Av., Oklahoma City, OK 73120, USA.
4 Haskins Laboratories, 300 George St., New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
5 Department of Psychology, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke St. West, Montreal, Quebec H4B 1R6, Canada.

Description:

Sensory deprivation can offset the balance of audio versus visual information in multimodal processing. Such a phenomenon could persist for children born deaf, even after they receive cochlear implants (CIs), and could potentially explain why one modality is given priority over the other. Here, we recorded cortical responses to a single speaker uttering two syllables, presented in audio-only (A), visual-only (V), and audio-visual (AV) modes. Electroencephalography (EEG) and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) were successively recorded in seventy-five school-aged children. Twenty-five were children with normal hearing (NH) and fifty wore CIs, among whom 26 had relatively high language abilities (HL) comparable to those of NH children, while 24 others had low language abilities (LL). In EEG data, visual-evoked potentials were captured in occipital regions, in response to V and AV stimuli, and they were accentuated in the HL group compared to the LL group (the NH group being intermediate). Close to the vertex, auditory-evoked potentials were captured in response to A and AV stimuli and reflected a differential treatment of the two syllables but only in the NH group. None of the EEG metrics revealed any interaction between group and modality. In fNIRS data, each modality induced a corresponding activity in visual or auditory regions, but no group difference was observed in A, V, or AV stimulation. The present study did not reveal any sign of abnormal AV integration in children with CI. An efficient multimodal integrative network (at least for rudimentary speech materials) is clearly not a sufficient condition to exhibit good language and literacy.





BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University