| Keyword search (4,163 papers available) | ![]() |
"Erector spinae" Keyword-tagged Publications:
| Title | Authors | PubMed ID | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Comparison of paraspinal muscle composition measurements using IDEAL fat-water and T2-weighted MR images | Sara Masi | 36997912 PERFORM |
| 2 | Evaluation of an automated thresholding algorithm for the quantification of paraspinal muscle composition from MRI images. | Fortin M, Omidyeganeh M, Battié MC, Ahmad O, Rivaz H | 28532491 PERFORM |
| 3 | Association between paraspinal muscle morphology, clinical symptoms and functional status in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. | Fortin M, Lazáry À, Varga PP, Battié MC | 28748488 PERFORM |
| Title: | Comparison of paraspinal muscle composition measurements using IDEAL fat-water and T2-weighted MR images | ||||
| Authors: | Sara Masi | ||||
| Link: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36997912/ | ||||
| DOI: | 10.1186/s12880-023-00992-w | ||||
| Publication: | BMC medical imaging | ||||
| Keywords: | Erector spinae; Fatty infiltration; IDEAL; Magnetic resonance imaging; Multifidus; Paraspinal muscle; Psoas major; | ||||
| PMID: | 36997912 | Category: | Date Added: | 2023-03-31 | |
| Dept Affiliation: |
PERFORM
1 Department of Health Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke Street W, SP-165.29, Montreal, QC, H4B 1R6, Canada. 2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. 3 Department of Health Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke Street W, SP-165.29, Montreal, QC, H4B 1R6, Canada. maryse.fortin@concordia.ca. 4 PERFORM Centre, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada. maryse.fortin@concordia.ca. 5 Centre de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Réadaptation (CRIR), Montreal, QC, Canada. maryse.fortin@concordia.ca. |
||||
Description: |
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that utilizing fat-water and T2-weighted MR images are comparable for quantifying multifidus and erector spinae muscle composition but not of the psoas major. While this suggests that both methods could be used interchangeably for the multifidus and erector spinae, further evaluation is required to expand and confirm our findings to other spinal levels. |



