Keyword search (4,163 papers available)

"Ethics" Keyword-tagged Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 Gaza: rethinking and decolonizing mental health responses in humanitarian emergencies Mc Mahon A; Merchant H; Alkhatib S; Khanyari S; Alami T; Sader E; Nachabe J; El-Khoury J; Jabr S; 41681124
PSYCHOLOGY
2 Research as intervention? Exploring the health and well-being of children and youth facing global adversity through participatory visual methods D' Amico M; Denov M; Khan F; Linds W; Akesson B; 27043374
EDUCATION
3 Who Should Decide How Machines Make Morally Laden Decisions? Dominic Martin 27905083
JMSB
4 A Public Health Ethics Case for Mitigating Zoonotic Disease Risk in Food Production Bernstein J; Dutkiewicz J; 33997264
SOCANTH
5 Vulnerabilities in clinician-parent exchanges and the cascade of communication traps: a review Ferretti E; Schoenherr JR; Mattiola A; Daboval T; 35383036
PSYCHOLOGY
6 Substance Use Research with Indigenous Communities: Exploring and Extending Foundational Principles of Community Psychology. Wendt DC, Hartmann WE, Allen J, Burack JA, Charles B, D'Amico EJ, Dell CA, Dickerson DL, Donovan DM, Gone JP, O'Connor RM, Radin SM, Rasmus SM, Venner KL, Walls ML 31365138
PSYCHOLOGY
7 Chaco Canyon Dig Unearths Ethical Concerns. Claw KG, Lippert D, Bardill J, Cordova A, Fox K, Yracheta JM, Bader AC, Bolnick DA, Malhi RS, TallBear K, Garrison NA 29745246
CONCORDIA

 

Title:Who Should Decide How Machines Make Morally Laden Decisions?
Authors:Dominic Martin
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27905083/
DOI:10.1007/s11948-016-9833-7
Publication:Science and engineering ethics
Keywords:Artificial intelligenceCollective decision-makingEconomic efficiencyEthicsMarket freedomMoral agencyPublic policiesRegulationSelf-driving car
PMID:27905083 Category: Date Added:2016-12-02
Dept Affiliation: JMSB
1 John Molson School of Business, Concordia University, Montréal, Canada. dominic.martin@concordia.ca.
2 Department of Philosophy, McGill University, Montréal, Canada. dominic.martin@concordia.ca.

Description:

Who should decide how a machine will decide what to do when it is driving a car, performing a medical procedure, or, more generally, when it is facing any kind of morally laden decision? More and more, machines are making complex decisions with a considerable level of autonomy. We should be much more preoccupied by this problem than we currently are. After a series of preliminary remarks, this paper will go over four possible answers to the question raised above. First, we may claim that it is the maker of a machine that gets to decide how it will behave in morally laden scenarios. Second, we may claim that the users of a machine should decide. Third, that decision may have to be made collectively or, fourth, by other machines built for this special purpose. The paper argues that each of these approaches suffers from its own shortcomings, and it concludes by showing, among other things, which approaches should be emphasized for different types of machines, situations, and/or morally laden decisions.





BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University