Keyword search (4,163 papers available)

"MEG" Keyword-tagged Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 Human Auditory-Motor Networks Show Frequency-Specific Phase-Based Coupling in Resting-State MEG Bedford O; Noly-Gandon A; Ara A; Wiesman AI; Albouy P; Baillet S; Penhune V; Zatorre RJ; 39757971
PSYCHOLOGY
2 EEG/MEG source imaging of deep brain activity within the maximum entropy on the mean framework: Simulations and validation in epilepsy Afnan J; Cai Z; Lina JM; Abdallah C; Delaire E; Avigdor T; Ros V; Hedrich T; von Ellenrieder N; Kobayashi E; Frauscher B; Gotman J; Grova C; 38994740
SOH
3 New Megastigmane and Polyphenolic Components of Henna Leaves and Their Tumor-Specific Cytotoxicity on Human Oral Squamous Carcinoma Cell Lines Orabi MAA; Orabi EA; Awadh AAA; Alshahrani MM; Abdel-Wahab BA; Sakagami H; Hatano T; 38001804
CHEMBIOCHEM
4 The neurophysiology of closed-loop auditory stimulation in sleep: A magnetoencephalography study Jourde HR; Merlo R; Brooks M; Rowe M; Coffey EBJ; 37675803
CONCORDIA
5 Air monitoring of tire-derived chemicals in global megacities using passive samplers Johannessen C; Saini A; Zhang X; Harner T; 36152723
CHEMBIOCHEM
6 Effects of Independent Component Analysis on Magnetoencephalography Source Localization in Pre-surgical Frontal Lobe Epilepsy Patients Pellegrino G, Xu M, Alkuwaiti A, Porras-Bettancourt M, Abbas G, Lina JM, Grova C, Kobayashi E, 32582009
PERFORM
7 Accuracy and spatial properties of distributed magnetic source imaging techniques in the investigation of focal epilepsy patients. Pellegrino G, Hedrich T, Porras-Bettancourt M, Lina JM, Aydin Ü, Hall J, Grova C, Kobayashi E 32386115
PERFORM
8 Differences in MEG and EEG power-law scaling explained by a coupling between spatial coherence and frequency: a simulation study. Bénar CG, Grova C, Jirsa VK, Lina JM 31292816
PERFORM
9 Localization Accuracy of Distributed Inverse Solutions for Electric and Magnetic Source Imaging of Interictal Epileptic Discharges in Patients with Focal Epilepsy. Heers M, Chowdhury RA, Hedrich T, Dubeau F, Hall JA, Lina JM, Grova C, Kobayashi E 25609211
PERFORM
10 Source localization of the seizure onset zone from ictal EEG/MEG data. Pellegrino G, Hedrich T, Chowdhury R, Hall JA, Lina JM, Dubeau F, Kobayashi E, Grova C 27059157
PERFORM
11 Zoomed MRI Guided by Combined EEG/MEG Source Analysis: A Multimodal Approach for Optimizing Presurgical Epilepsy Work-up and its Application in a Multi-focal Epilepsy Patient Case Study. Aydin Ü, Rampp S, Wollbrink A, Kugel H, Cho J-, Knösche TR, Grova C, Wellmer J, Wolters CH 28510905
PERFORM
12 Clinical yield of magnetoencephalography distributed source imaging in epilepsy: A comparison with equivalent current dipole method. Pellegrino G, Hedrich T, Chowdhury RA, Hall JA, Dubeau F, Lina JM, Kobayashi E, Grova C 29024165
PERFORM
13 Reproducibility of EEG-MEG fusion source analysis of interictal spikes: Relevance in presurgical evaluation of epilepsy. Chowdhury RA, Pellegrino G, Aydin Ü, Lina JM, Dubeau F, Kobayashi E, Grova C 29164737
PERFORM
14 Comparison of the spatial resolution of source imaging techniques in high-density EEG and MEG. Hedrich T, Pellegrino G, Kobayashi E, Lina JM, Grova C 28619655
PERFORM

 

Title:Clinical yield of magnetoencephalography distributed source imaging in epilepsy: A comparison with equivalent current dipole method.
Authors:Pellegrino GHedrich TChowdhury RAHall JADubeau FLina JMKobayashi EGrova C
Link:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29024165?dopt=Abstract
DOI:10.1002/hbm.23837
Publication:Human brain mapping
Keywords:MEGdipoledistributed sourceinterictal epileptiform dischargesmagnetic source imagingpresurgical evaluationsource localizationspikesurgery
PMID:29024165 Category:Hum Brain Mapp Date Added:2019-06-04
Dept Affiliation: PERFORM
1 Multimodal Functional Imaging Lab, Biomedical Engineering Department, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
2 Neurology and Neurosurgery Department, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
3 IRCCS Fondazione San Camillo Hospital, Venice, Italy.
4 Departement de Génie Electrique, Ecole de Technologie Supérieure, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
5 Centre De Recherches En Mathématiques, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
6 Centre D'études Avancées En Médecine Du Sommeil, Centre De Recherche De L'hôpital Sacré-Coeur De Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
7 Physics Department and PERFORM Centre, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Description:

Clinical yield of magnetoencephalography distributed source imaging in epilepsy: A comparison with equivalent current dipole method.

Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 01;39(1):218-231

Authors: Pellegrino G, Hedrich T, Chowdhury RA, Hall JA, Dubeau F, Lina JM, Kobayashi E, Grova C

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Source localization of interictal epileptic discharges (IEDs) is clinically useful in the presurgical workup of epilepsy patients. It is usually obtained by equivalent current dipole (ECD) which localizes a point source and is the only inverse solution approved by clinical guidelines. In contrast, magnetic source imaging using distributed methods (dMSI) provides maps of the location and the extent of the generators, but its yield has not been clinically validated. We systematically compared ECD versus dMSI performed using coherent Maximum Entropy on the Mean (cMEM), a method sensitive to the spatial extent of the generators.

METHODS: 340 source localizations of IEDs derived from 49 focal epilepsy patients with foci well-defined through intracranial EEG, MRI lesions, and surgery were analyzed. The comparison was based on the assessment of the sublobar concordance with the focus and of the distance between the source and the focus.

RESULTS: dMSI sublobar concordance was significantly higher than ECD (81% vs 69%, P?<?0.001), especially for extratemporal lobe sources (dMSI?=?84%; ECD?=?67%, P?<?0.001) and for seizure free patients (dMSI?=?83%; ECD?=?70%, P?<?0.001). The median distance from the focus was 4.88 mm for ECD and 3.44 mm for dMSI (P?<?0.001). ECD dipoles were often wrongly localized in deep brain regions.

CONCLUSIONS: dMSI using cMEM exhibited better accuracy. dMSI also offered the advantage of recovering more realistic maps of the generator, which could be exploited for neuronavigation aimed at targeting invasive EEG and surgical resection. Therefore, dMSI may be preferred to ECD in clinical practice. Hum Brain Mapp 39:218-231, 2018. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

PMID: 29024165 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]





BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University