Keyword search (4,164 papers available)

"OCD" Keyword-tagged Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 Obsessive-compulsive symptoms moderate the effect of contamination motion on disgust intensity Pelzer M; Ouellet-Courtois C; Krause S; Coughtrey A; Fink-Lamotte J; 40858003
CCRH
2 Reappraising beliefs about losing control: An experimental investigation Fridgen CPEA; Radomsky AS; 39837217
PSYCHOLOGY
3 Further analyses of appraisals of losing control and other OCD-related cognitions: A quasi-experimental investigation Sandstrom A; Radomsky AS; 39626976
PSYCHOLOGY
4 Development and psychometric evaluation of the Violation Appraisal Measure (VAM) Krause S; Radomsky AS; 39206950
PSYCHOLOGY
5 'Things that shouldn't be': a qualitative investigation of violation-related appraisals in individuals with OCD and/or trauma histories Krause S; Radomsky AS; 38679952
PSYCHOLOGY
6 What's control got to do with it? A systematic review of control beliefs in obsessive-compulsive disorder Sandstrom A; Krause S; Ouellet-Courtois C; Kelly-Turner K; Radomsky AS; 38091769
PSYCHOLOGY
7 Beliefs about losing control and other OCD-related cognitions: An experimental investigation Sandstrom A; Radomsky AS; 37948951
PSYCHOLOGY
8 The fear of losing control Adam S Radomsky 36113905
PSYCHOLOGY
9 "Was I asking for it?": An experimental investigation of perceived responsibility, mental contamination and workplace sexual harassment. Krause S, Radomsky AS 33321247
PSYCHOLOGY
10 The Covert and Overt Reassurance Seeking Inventory (CORSI): Development, validation and psychometric analyses. Radomsky AS, Neal RL, Parrish CL, Lavoie SL, Schell SE 33046164
CONCORDIA
11 Hoping for more: How cognitive science has and hasn't been helpful to the OCD clinician. Ouimet AJ, Ashbaugh AR, Radomsky AS 29673581
PSYCHOLOGY
12 Beliefs about losing control, obsessions, and caution: An experimental investigation. Gagné JP, Radomsky AS 32045733
PSYCHOLOGY
13 What do you really need? Self- and partner-reported intervention preferences within cognitive behavioural therapy for reassurance seeking behaviour. Neal RL, Radomsky AS 31495351
PSYCHOLOGY

 

Title:The Covert and Overt Reassurance Seeking Inventory (CORSI): Development, validation and psychometric analyses.
Authors:Radomsky ASNeal RLParrish CLLavoie SLSchell SE
Link:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33046164
DOI:10.1017/S1352465820000703
Publication:Behavioural and cognitive psychotherapy
Keywords:anxietyassessmentdepressionobsessive-compulsive disorder or OCDreassurance seekingvalidation
PMID:33046164 Category:Behav Cogn Psychother Date Added:2020-10-14
Dept Affiliation: CONCORDIA
1 Concordia University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.

Description:

The Covert and Overt Reassurance Seeking Inventory (CORSI): Development, validation and psychometric analyses.

Behav Cogn Psychother. 2020 Oct 13; :1-18

Authors: Radomsky AS, Neal RL, Parrish CL, Lavoie SL, Schell SE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reassurance seeking (RS) is motivated by perceived general and social/relational threats across disorders, yet is often under-recognized because it occurs in covert (i.e. subtle) and overt forms. Covert safety-seeking behaviour may maintain disorders by preventing corrective learning and is therefore important to identify effectively.

AIMS: This study presents the validation and psychometric analyses of a novel measure of covert and overt, general and social/relational threat-related interpersonal RS.

METHOD: An initial 30-item measure was administered to an undergraduate sample (N = 1626), as well as to samples of individuals diagnosed with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD; n = 50), anxiety disorders (n = 60) and depression (n = 30). The data were subjected to exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, and validation analyses.

RESULTS: An exploratory factor analysis using principal axis factoring with oblique rotation yielded five interpretable factors, after removing four complex items. The resulting 26-item measure, the Covert and Overt Reassurance Seeking Inventory (CORSI), evidenced good convergent and divergent validity and accounted for 54.99% of the total variance after extraction. Factor correlations ranged from r = .268 to .736, suggesting that they may be tapping into unique facets of RS behaviour. In comparison with undergraduate participants, all clinical groups had significantly higher total scores [t (51.80-840) = 3.92-5.84, p < .001]. The CFA confirmed the five-factor model with good fit following the addition of four covariance terms (goodness of fit index = .897, comparative fit index = .918, Tucker-Lewis index = .907, root mean square error approximation = .061).

CONCLUSION: The CORSI is a brief, yet comprehensive and psychometrically strong measure of problematic RS. With further validation, the CORSI has potential for use within clinical and research contexts.

PMID: 33046164 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]





BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University