Keyword search (4,163 papers available)

"cochlear implant" Keyword-tagged Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 Speech, Timbre, and Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implant Users With Flat-Panel CT-Based Frequency Reallocations: A Longitudinal Prospective Study Gilbert ML; Lewis RM; Deroche MLD; Jiam NT; Jiradejvong P; Mo J; Cooke DL; Limb CJ; 40689899
PSYCHOLOGY
2 The neural characteristics influencing literacy outcome in children with cochlear implants Koirala N; Manning J; Neumann S; Anderson C; Deroche MLD; Wolfe J; Pugh K; Landi N; Muthuraman M; Gracco VL; 40046341
PSYCHOLOGY
3 Cross-modal plasticity in children with cochlear implant: converging evidence from EEG and functional near-infrared spectroscopy Deroche MLD; Wolfe J; Neumann S; Manning J; Hanna L; Towler W; Wilson C; Bien AG; Miller S; Schafer E; Gemignani J; Alemi R; Muthuraman M; Koirala N; Gracco VL; 38846536
PSYCHOLOGY
4 Audiovisual integration in children with cochlear implants revealed through EEG and fNIRS Alemi R; Wolfe J; Neumann S; Manning J; Towler W; Koirala N; Gracco VL; Deroche M; 37989460
PSYCHOLOGY
5 Motor Processing in Children With Cochlear Implants as Assessed by Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Alemi R; Wolfe J; Neumann S; Manning J; Hanna L; Towler W; Wilson C; Bien A; Miller S; Schafer E; Gemignani J; Koirala N; Gracco VL; Deroche M; 37977135
PSYCHOLOGY
6 Dynamic networks differentiate the language ability of children with cochlear implants Koirala N; Deroche MLD; Wolfe J; Neumann S; Bien AG; Doan D; Goldbeck M; Muthuraman M; Gracco VL; 37409105
PSYCHOLOGY
7 Auditory evoked response to an oddball paradigm in children wearing cochlear implants Deroche MLD; Wolfe J; Neumann S; Manning J; Towler W; Alemi R; Bien AG; Koirala N; Hanna L; Henry L; Gracco VL; 36965466
PSYCHOLOGY
8 Predicting emotion perception abilities for cochlear implant users Paquette S; Deroche MLD; Goffi-Gomez MV; Hoshino ACH; Lehmann A; 36047767
PSYCHOLOGY
9 Processing of Acoustic Information in Lexical Tone Production and Perception by Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients. Deroche MLD, Lu HP, Lin YS, Chatterjee M, Peng SC 31281237
PSYCHOLOGY

 

Title:Processing of Acoustic Information in Lexical Tone Production and Perception by Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Authors:Deroche MLDLu HPLin YSChatterjee MPeng SC
Link:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31281237?dopt=Abstract
DOI:10.3389/fnins.2019.00639
Publication:Frontiers in neuroscience
Keywords:childrencochlear implantcue tradinglexical tonespeech production
PMID:31281237 Category:Front Neurosci Date Added:2019-08-07
Dept Affiliation: PSYCHOLOGY
1 Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
2 Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.
3 Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
4 Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, NE, United States.
5 United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States.

Description:

Processing of Acoustic Information in Lexical Tone Production and Perception by Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Front Neurosci. 2019;13:639

Authors: Deroche MLD, Lu HP, Lin YS, Chatterjee M, Peng SC

Abstract

Purpose: This study examined the utilization of multiple types of acoustic information in lexical tone production and perception by pediatric cochlear implant (CI) recipients who are native speakers of Mandarin Chinese. Methods: Lexical tones were recorded from CI recipients and their peers with normal hearing (NH). Each participant was asked to produce a disyllabic word, yan jing, with which the first syllable was pronounced as Tone 3 (a low dipping tone) while the second syllable was pronounced as Tone 1 (a high level tone, meaning "eyes") or as Tone 4 (a high falling tone, meaning "eyeglasses"). In addition, a parametric manipulation in fundamental frequency (F0) and duration of Tones 1 and 4 used in a lexical tone recognition task in Peng et al. (2017) was adopted to evaluate the perceptual reliance on each dimension. Results: Mixed-effect analyses of duration, intensity, and F0 cues revealed that NH children focused exclusively on marking distinct F0 contours, while CI participants shortened Tone 4 or prolonged Tone 1 to enhance their contrast. In line with these production strategies, NH children relied primarily on F0 cues to identify the two tones, whereas CI children showed greater reliance on duration cues. Moreover, CI participants who placed greater perceptual weight on duration cues also tended to exhibit smaller changes in their F0 production. Conclusion: Pediatric CI recipients appear to contrast the secondary acoustic dimension (duration) in addition to F0 contours for both lexical tone production and perception. These findings suggest that perception and production strategies of lexical tones are well coupled in this pediatric CI population.

PMID: 31281237 [PubMed]





BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University