Keyword search (4,164 papers available)

"intracranial self-stimulation" Keyword-tagged Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 Discriminative properties of rewarding electrical brain stimulation Pacheco-Gomez BL; Zepeda-Ruiz WA; Velazquez-Lopez D; Shizgal P; Velazquez-Martinez DN; 40015584
CSBN
2 Does phasic dopamine release cause policy updates? Carter F; Cossette MP; Trujillo-Pisanty I; Pallikaras V; Breton YA; Conover K; Caplan J; Solis P; Voisard J; Yaksich A; Shizgal P; 38039083
PSYCHOLOGY
3 The Convergence Model of Brain Reward Circuitry: Implications for Relief of Treatment-Resistant Depression by Deep-Brain Stimulation of the Medial Forebrain Bundle Pallikaras V; Shizgal P; 35431828
PSYCHOLOGY

 

Title:Does phasic dopamine release cause policy updates?
Authors:Carter FCossette MPTrujillo-Pisanty IPallikaras VBreton YAConover KCaplan JSolis PVoisard JYaksich AShizgal P
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38039083/
DOI:10.1111/ejn.16199
Publication:The European journal of neuroscience
Keywords:intracranial self-stimulationoperant conditioningreinforcement learningreward
PMID:38039083 Category: Date Added:2023-12-01
Dept Affiliation: PSYCHOLOGY
1 Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
2 Montreal Institute for Learning Algorithms, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
3 Department of Psychology, Langara College, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Description:

Phasic dopamine activity is believed to both encode reward-prediction errors (RPEs) and to cause the adaptations that these errors engender. If so, a rat working for optogenetic stimulation of dopamine neurons will repeatedly update its policy and/or action values, thus iteratively increasing its work rate. Here, we challenge this view by demonstrating stable, non-maximal work rates in the face of repeated optogenetic stimulation of midbrain dopamine neurons. Furthermore, we show that rats learn to discriminate between world states distinguished only by their history of dopamine activation. Comparison of these results to reinforcement learning simulations suggests that the induced dopamine transients acted more as rewards than RPEs. However, pursuit of dopaminergic stimulation drifted upwards over a time scale of days and weeks, despite its stability within trials. To reconcile the results with prior findings, we consider multiple roles for dopamine signalling.





BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University