Keyword search (4,164 papers available)

"recognition" Keyword-tagged Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 In Shift and In Variance: Assessing the Robustness of HAR Deep Learning Models Against Variability Khaked AA; Oishi N; Roggen D; Lago P; 39860799
ENCS
2 The effects of competition and implicit power motive on men's testosterone, emotion recognition, and aggression Vongas JG; Al Hajj R; 28455183
JMSB
3 Winter's Topography, Law, and the Colonial Legal Imaginary in British Columbia Matthew P Unger 37885918
CONCORDIA
4 Invariant Pattern Recognition with Log-Polar Transform and Dual-Tree Complex Wavelet-Fourier Features Chen G; Krzyzak A; 37112182
ENCS
5 Human Activity Recognition with an HMM-Based Generative Model Manouchehri N; Bouguila N; 36772428
ENCS
6 Disturbance cues function as a background risk cue but not as an associative learning cue in tadpoles Rivera-Hernández IAE; Crane AL; Pollock MS; Ferrari MCO; 35099624
BIOLOGY
7 Entropy-Based Variational Scheme with Component Splitting for the Efficient Learning of Gamma Mixtures Bourouis S; Pawar Y; Bouguila N; 35009726
ENCS
8 Human Activity Recognition: A Comparative Study to Assess the Contribution Level of Accelerometer, ECG, and PPG Signals Afzali Arani MS; Costa DE; Shihab E; 34770303
ENCS
9 Complementary variable- and person-centered approaches to the dimensionality of burnout among fire station workers Sandrin E; Morin AJS; Fernet C; Gillet N; 34314264
CONCORDIA
10 On the Impact of Biceps Muscle Fatigue in Human Activity Recognition. Elshafei M, Costa DE, Shihab E 33557239
ENCS
11 Towards Detecting Biceps Muscle Fatigue in Gym Activity Using Wearables. Elshafei M, Shihab E 33498702
ENCS
12 A Benchmark of Data Stream Classification for Human Activity Recognition on Connected Objects. Khannouz M; Glatard T; 33202905
ENCS
13 A Go/No-go delayed nonmatching-to-sample procedure to measure object-recognition memory in rats. Cole E, Chad M, Moman V, Mumby DG 32533993
PSYCHOLOGY
14 Effects of perirhinal cortex and hippocampal lesions on rats' performance on two object-recognition tasks. Cole E, Ziadé J, Simundic A, Mumby DG 31877339
PSYCHOLOGY
15 A Quantitative Comparison of Overlapping and Non-Overlapping Sliding Windows for Human Activity Recognition Using Inertial Sensors. Dehghani A, Sarbishei O, Glatard T, Shihab E 31752158
ENCS

 

Title:Effects of perirhinal cortex and hippocampal lesions on rats' performance on two object-recognition tasks.
Authors:Cole EZiadé JSimundic AMumby DG
Link:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31877339?dopt=Abstract
DOI:10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112450
Publication:Behavioural brain research
Keywords:HippocampusNovel-object preferenceObject-recognitionPerirhinal cortexRat
PMID:31877339 Category:Behav Brain Res Date Added:2019-12-27
Dept Affiliation: PSYCHOLOGY
1 Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montréal, QC, Canada. Electronic address: e_cole@live.concordia.ca.
2 Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montréal, QC, Canada.

Description:

Effects of perirhinal cortex and hippocampal lesions on rats' performance on two object-recognition tasks.

Behav Brain Res. 2019 Dec 23;:112450

Authors: Cole E, Ziadé J, Simundic A, Mumby DG

Abstract

The effects of hippocampal (HPC) damage on rats' novel object preference (NOP) performance have been rather consistent, in that HPC lesions do not disrupt novelty preferences on the test. Conversely, there have been inconsistent findings regarding the effects of perirhinal cortex (PRh) lesions on rats' novel-object preferences. Given the concerns that have been raised regarding the internal validity of the NOP test, viz. that the magnitude of the novel-object preference does not necessarily reflect the strength in memory for an object, it could explain the discrepant findings. The goal of the present experiment was to examine the effects of PRh and HPC lesions on rats' object-recognition memory using a new modified delayed nonmatching-to-sample (mDNMS) task, as it circumvents the interpretational problems associated with the NOP test. Rats received PRh, HPC, or Sham lesions and were trained on the mDNMS task using a short delay (~30?s). Both PRh and HPC rats acquired the task at the same rate as Sham rats, and reached a similar level of accuracy, indicating intact object-recognition. Thereafter, rats were tested on the NOP test using a 180-s delay. Rats with HPC lesions exhibited significant novel-object preferences, however, both the PRh and Sham rats failed to show a novelty preference. The discrepancy in both the PRh and Sham rats' performance on the mDNMS task and NOP test raises concerns regarding the internal validity of the NOP test, in that the magnitude of a rat's novel-object preference does not accurately reflect the persistence or accuracy of a rat's memory for the sample object.

PMID: 31877339 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]





BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University