Keyword search (3,448 papers available)


Evaluation of Communication Skills Among Physicians: A Reply to the Commentary by Smith, Kovar-Gough, and Grayson-Sneed.

Author(s): Boucher VG, Gemme C, Dragomir AI, Larue F, Bacon SL, Lavoie KL

Psychosom Med. 2020 Oct 14; : Authors: Boucher VG, Gemme C, Dragomir AI, Larue F, Bacon SL, Lavoie KL PMID: 33060452 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Article GUID: 33060452

Evaluation of communication skills among physicians: A systematic review of existing assessment tools.

Author(s): Boucher VG, Gemme C, Dragomir AI, Bacon SL, Larue F, Lavoie KL

Psychosom Med. 2020 Mar 09;: Authors: Boucher VG, Gemme C, Dragomir AI, Bacon SL, Larue F, Lavoie KL

Article GUID: 32168109

An international Delphi consensus study to define motivational communication in the context of developing a training program for physicians.

Author(s): Dragomir AI, Boucher VG, Bacon SL, Gemme C, Szczepanik G, Corace K, Campbell TS, Vallis MT, Garber G, Rouleau C, Rabi D, Diodati JG, Ghali W, Lavoie KL

Transl Behav Med. 2020 Mar 07;: Authors: Dragomir AI, Boucher VG, Bacon SL, Gemme C, Szczepanik G, Corace K, Campbell TS, Vallis MT, Garber G, Rouleau C, Rabi D, Diodati JG, Ghali W, Lavoie KL

Article GUID: 32145022

Training physicians in behavioural change counseling: A systematic review.

Author(s): Dragomir AI, Julien CA, Bacon SL, Boucher VG, Lavoie KL, Canadian Network for Health Behavior Change and Promotion (CAN-Change)

Patient Educ Couns. 2019 01;102(1):12-24 Authors: Dragomir AI, Julien CA, Bacon SL, Boucher VG, Lavoie KL, Canadian Network for Health Behavior Change and Promotion (CAN-Change)

Article GUID: 30172573


Title:Training physicians in behavioural change counseling: A systematic review.
Authors:Dragomir AIJulien CABacon SLBoucher VGLavoie KLCanadian Network for Health Behavior Change and Promotion (CAN-Change)
Link:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30172573?dopt=Abstract
Category:Patient Educ Couns
PMID:30172573
Dept Affiliation: HKAP
1 Department of Psychology, Université du Québec à Montréal, Canada; Montreal Behavioural Medicine Centre, Centre Intégré Universitaire de santé et services sociaux du Nord-de-l'Ile-de-Montréal (CIUSSS-NIM), Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Canada.
2 Montreal Behavioural Medicine Centre, Centre Intégré Universitaire de santé et services sociaux du Nord-de-l'Ile-de-Montréal (CIUSSS-NIM), Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Canada; Department of Health, Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Canada.
3 Department of Psychology, Université du Québec à Montréal, Canada; Montreal Behavioural Medicine Centre, Centre Intégré Universitaire de santé et services sociaux du Nord-de-l'Ile-de-Montréal (CIUSSS-NIM), Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Canada. Electronic address: lavoie.kim@uqam.ca.

Description:

Training physicians in behavioural change counseling: A systematic review.

Patient Educ Couns. 2019 01;102(1):12-24

Authors: Dragomir AI, Julien CA, Bacon SL, Boucher VG, Lavoie KL, Canadian Network for Health Behavior Change and Promotion (CAN-Change)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Poor health behaviours (e.g., smoking, physical inactivity) represent major underlying causes of non-communicable chronic diseases (NCDs). Prescriptive behaviour change interventions employed by physicians show limited effectiveness. Physician training in evidence-based behaviour change counselling (BCC) may improve behavioural risk factor management, but the efficacy and feasibility of current programs remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE: (1) To systematically review the efficacy of BCC training programs for physicians, and (2) to describe program content, dose and structure, informing better design and dissemination.

METHODS: Using PRISMA guidelines, a database search up to January 2018, yielded 1889 unique articles, screened by 2 authors; 9 studies met inclusion criteria and were retained for analysis.

RESULTS: 100% of studies reported significant improvements in BCC skills among physicians, most programs targeting provider-patient collaboration, supporting patient autonomy, and use of open questions to elicit "change-talk". Limitation included: poor reporting quality, high program heterogeneity, small sample sizes, 78% of studies having no comparison group, and less than 30% of skills taught being formally assessed.

CONCLUSION: Training programs were efficacious, but methodological weaknesses limit the ability to determine content and delivery. Caution is necessary when interpreting the results.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Further research emphasizing rigorous training program development and testing is warranted.

PMID: 30172573 [PubMed - in process]