Keyword search (3,156 papers available)


Moderate to Substantial Inter-Rater Reliability in the Assessment of Cranial Bone Mobility Restrictions.

Author(s): Demers K, Morin C, Collette L, DeMont R

Background: The World Health Organization benchmarks for osteopathic training consider cranial osteopathy as an important manual skill. Studies of cranial manual therapy have exhibited poor reliability. The aim of this study was to investigate the inter-rat...

Article GUID: 33395535
Knee joint kinematics and neuromuscular responses in female athletes during and after multi-directional perturbations.

Author(s): Damavandi M, Mahendrarajah L, Dixon PC, DeMont R

Hum Mov Sci. 2020 Apr;70:102596 Authors: Damavandi M, Mahendrarajah L, Dixon PC, DeMont R

Article GUID: 32217214
Title:Moderate to Substantial Inter-Rater Reliability in the Assessment of Cranial Bone Mobility Restrictions.
Authors:Demers K,  Morin C,  Collette L,  DeMont R
Link:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33395535
Category:J Altern Complement Med
PMID:33395535
Dept Affiliation: HKAP
1 Department of Health, Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.
2 Centre Ostéopathique du Québec, Montréal, Canada.
3 Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation, Sherbrooke University, Sherbrooke, Canada.

Description:

Moderate to Substantial Inter-Rater Reliability in the Assessment of Cranial Bone Mobility Restrictions.

J Altern Complement Med. 2021 Jan 04; :

Authors: Demers K, Morin C, Collette L, DeMont R

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization benchmarks for osteopathic training consider cranial osteopathy as an important manual skill. Studies of cranial manual therapy have exhibited poor reliability. The aim of this study was to investigate the inter-rater reliability of the manual mobility tests of the spheno-occipital synchondrosis (SOS), and the temporal, parietal, and frontal bones, as assessed in osteopathic manual therapy. Methods: Twenty-one adults were assessed on a single day by three experienced osteopaths using a standard assessment protocol. Before data collection, the osteopaths participated in a consensus training, which included establishing the criteria for identifying a cranial bone mobility restriction; the application of the seven-step palpation method; a pretesting practice; a fine-tuning palpation training; and a calibration period before the assessment of the subjects. Three subjects were assessed simultaneously with the evaluators rotating to assess each subject. The evaluators were blinded to the subject by a curtain, and each other's assessments. Each bone was rated as restricted or not restricted. The authors applied the Landis and Koch classification to describe the magnitude of inter-rater reliability. Results: Moderate reliability was established for a lateral strain of the SOS (Fleiss' generalized kappa 0.48), substantial reliability was established for the other SOS strain patterns (Fleiss' generalized kappa 0.62-0.75), and almost perfect reliability for temporal, parietal, and frontal bone (Fleiss' generalized kappa 0.81-0.96). Conclusion: The results demonstrate consistency when three experienced osteopaths evaluate cranial bone mobility restrictions. The results highlight the importance of consensus training and rigorous methodology in manual therapy reliability studies.

PMID: 33395535 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]