Keyword search (3,448 papers available)


Dissociable mesolimbic dopamine circuits control responding triggered by alcohol-predictive discrete cues and contexts.

Author(s): Valyear MD, Glovaci I, Zaari A, Lahlou S, Trujillo-Pisanty I, Andrew Chapman C, Chaudhri N

Nat Commun. 2020 Jul 28;11(1):3764 Authors: Valyear MD, Glovaci I, Zaari A, Lahlou S, Trujillo-Pisanty I, Andrew Chapman C, Chaudhri N

Article GUID: 32724058
Modeling Relapse to Pavlovian Alcohol-Seeking in Rats Using Reinstatement and Spontaneous Recovery Paradigms.

Author(s): LeCocq MR, Lahlou S, Chahine M, Padillo LN, Chaudhri N

Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018 Sep;42(9):1795-1806 Authors: LeCocq MR, Lahlou S, Chahine M, Padillo LN, Chaudhri N

Article GUID: 29969151
Title:Modeling Relapse to Pavlovian Alcohol-Seeking in Rats Using Reinstatement and Spontaneous Recovery Paradigms.
Authors:LeCocq MR,  Lahlou S,  Chahine M,  Padillo LN,  Chaudhri N
Link:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29969151?dopt=Abstract
Category:Alcohol Clin Exp Res
PMID:29969151
Dept Affiliation: CSBN
1 Department of Psychology, Center for Studies in Behavioral Neurobiology/FRQS Groupe de recherche en neurobiologie comportementale, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Description:

Modeling Relapse to Pavlovian Alcohol-Seeking in Rats Using Reinstatement and Spontaneous Recovery Paradigms.

Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018 Sep;42(9):1795-1806

Authors: LeCocq MR, Lahlou S, Chahine M, Padillo LN, Chaudhri N

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Animal models are critical for studying causal explanations of relapse. Using a Pavlovian conditioning procedure with alcohol, we examined relapse after extinction triggered by either re-exposure to alcohol (reinstatement) or a delay between extinction and test (spontaneous recovery).

METHODS: Male, Long-Evans rats were acclimated to 15% alcohol in the home-cage using an intermittent-access 2-bottle choice procedure. Next, they received Pavlovian conditioning sessions in which an auditory-conditioned stimulus (CS; 20 second white noise; 8 trials/session; variable time 240 seconds) was paired with 15% alcohol (0.3 ml/CS; 2.4 ml/session) that was delivered into a fluid port for oral ingestion. In subsequent extinction and test sessions, CS presentations occurred as before, but without alcohol.

RESULTS: In experiment 1, exposure to either alcohol or water in the fluid port following extinction reinstated CS-elicited port entries at test 24 hours later. In a follow-up study using the same procedure (experiment 2), reinstatement was more robustly stimulated by alcohol, compared to a familiar lemon-flavored liquid. In experiment 3, systemic alcohol injections (0, 0.5, or 1.0 g/kg, intraperitoneal) administered either 24 hours or 15 minutes before test did not reinstate CS-elicited alcohol-seeking. Importantly, enzymatic assays in experiment 4 revealed detectable levels of alcohol in the blood following oral alcohol intake or intraperitoneal injection, suggesting that a pharmacological effect was likely with either route of administration. Last, in experiment 5, a 23-day delay between extinction and test resulted in a robust spontaneous recovery of CS-elicited alcohol-seeking.

CONCLUSIONS: The reinstatement and spontaneous recovery effects revealed herein provide evidence of viable new behavioral paradigms for testing interventions against relapse.

PMID: 29969151 [PubMed - in process]