Keyword search (3,448 papers available)


Zoo soundscape: Daily variation of low-to-high-frequency sounds.

Author(s): Pelletier C, Weladji RB, Lazure L, Paré P

Zoo Biol. 2020 Jul 31;: Authors: Pelletier C, Weladji RB, Lazure L, Paré P

Article GUID: 32735724

Activity budget and spatial distribution of Bennett's wallabies (Macropus rufogriseus) in open versus closed exhibit designs.

Author(s): Beaudin-Judd J, Weladji RB, Lazure L, Paré P

Zoo Biol. 2019 May;38(3):258-265 Authors: Beaudin-Judd J, Weladji RB, Lazure L, Paré P

Article GUID: 30997695


Title:Zoo soundscape: Daily variation of low-to-high-frequency sounds.
Authors:Pelletier CWeladji RBLazure LParé P
Link:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32735724
DOI:10.1002/zoo.21560
Category:Zoo Biol
PMID:32735724
Dept Affiliation: BIOLOGY
1 Department of Biology, Concordia University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
2 Conservation and Research Department, Zoo de Granby, Granby, Québec, Canada.

Description:

Zoo soundscape: Daily variation of low-to-high-frequency sounds.

Zoo Biol. 2020 Jul 31;:

Authors: Pelletier C, Weladji RB, Lazure L, Paré P

Abstract

Most studies assessing the impact of noises on zoo animal welfare did not measure sound frequencies outside of the human-hearing range (infrasounds and ultrasounds). Many nonhuman mammals can hear these frequencies, and because loud and variable soundscapes are potentially detrimental for animal welfare, this overlooked aspect of their acoustic environment could have important consequences. This study evaluated the soundscape of an urban zoo in a large frequency range (17.5-90,510?Hz) by measuring its average sound levels (Leq ) and variability (the difference between highest and lowest peaks). Sound data were collected for 24?hr in 25 locations (e.g., indoor, outdoor, near the amusement park). The soundscape was not considered problematic for animal welfare when looking at the average sound levels in most locations (<77-dB sound pressure level [SPL]), except for a few indoor areas and near the water park. Ultrasounds were rare, had low average sound levels, and were less variable in time. Infrasounds were always present and were the loudest and most variable sound frequencies. The soundscape was louder and more variable during the day and when visitors were present, suggesting that human-related activities were the sources of these augmentations. Indoor environments were generally louder than outdoor environments and touristic features; however, the water park was near 85-dB SPL during the day. On the basis of results, we suggest a series of mitigation actions to minimize noise-related stress in captive animals.

PMID: 32735724 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]