Keyword search (3,448 papers available)


Is Self-Compassion Universal? Support for the Measurement Invariance of the Self-Compassion Scale Across Populations.

Author(s): Tóth-Király I, Neff KD

Assessment. 2020 Jun 01;:1073191120926232 Authors: Tóth-Király I, Neff KD

Article GUID: 32475146
The Development and Validation of the Compassion Scale.

Author(s): Pommier E, Neff KD, Tóth-Király I

Assessment. 2019 Sep 13;:1073191119874108 Authors: Pommier E, Neff KD, Tóth-Király I

Article GUID: 31516024
Psychometric Properties of the Body Checking Questionnaire (BCQ) and of the Body Checking Cognitions Scale (BCCS): A Bifactor-Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Approach.

Author(s): Maïano C, Morin AJS, Aimé A, Lepage G, Bouchard S

Assessment. 2019 Jul 21;:1073191119858411 Authors: Maïano C, Morin AJS, Aimé A, Lepage G, Bouchard S

Article GUID: 31328530
Title:The Development and Validation of the Compassion Scale.
Authors:Pommier E,  Neff KD,  Tóth-Király I
Link:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31516024?dopt=Abstract
DOI:10.1177/1073191119874108
Category:Assessment
PMID:31516024
Dept Affiliation: CONCORDIA
1 University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
2 Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Description:

The Development and Validation of the Compassion Scale.

Assessment. 2019 Sep 13;:1073191119874108

Authors: Pommier E, Neff KD, Tóth-Király I

Abstract

This article presents a measure of compassion for others called the Compassion Scale (CS), which is based on Neff's theoretical model of self-compassion. Compassion was operationalized as experiencing kindness, a sense of common humanity, mindfulness, and lessened indifference toward the suffering of others. Study 1 (n = 465) describes the development of potential scale items and the final 16 CS items chosen based on results from analyses using bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling. Study 2 (n = 510) cross-validates the CS in a second student sample. Study 3 (n = 80) establishes test-retest reliability. Study 4 (n = 1,394) replicates results with a community sample, while Study 5 (n = 172) replicates results with a sample of meditators. Study 6 (n = 913) examines the finalized version of the CS in a community sample. Evidence regarding reliability, discriminant, convergent, construct, and known-groups validity for the CS is provided.

PMID: 31516024 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]