Keyword search (3,447 papers available)


Differential role of oxytocin and vasopressin in the conditioned ejaculatory preference of the male rat.

Author(s): Ménard S, Gelez H, Girard-Bériault F, Coria-Avila G, Pfaus JG

Physiol Behav. 2019 Jun 10;:112577 Authors: Ménard S, Gelez H, Girard-Bériault F, Coria-Avila G, Pfaus JG

Article GUID: 31194998

Corrigendum to "Effects of aerobic training, resistance training, or both on brain-derived neurotrophic factor in adolescents with obesity: The hearty randomized controlled trial" Physiology & Behavior, Volume 191, 1 July 2018, Pages 138-145.

Author(s): Goldfield GS, Kenny GP, Prud'homme D, Holcik M, Alberga AS, Fahnestock M, Cameron JD, Doucette S, Hadjiyannakis S, Tulloch H, Tremblay M...

Physiol Behav. 2019 Jan 01;198:161 Authors: Goldfield GS, Kenny GP, Prud'homme D, Holcik M, Alberga AS, Fahnestock M, Cameron JD, Doucette S, Hadjiyannakis S, Tulloch H, Tremblay MS, Walsh J, ...

Article GUID: 30428994

Infusions of ascorbic acid into the medial preoptic area facilitate appetitive sexual behavior in the female rat.

Author(s): Graham MD, Pfaus JG

Physiol Behav. 2013 Oct 02;122:140-6 Authors: Graham MD, Pfaus JG

Article GUID: 24064109

Modulatory effect of 17-β estradiol on performance of ovariectomized rats on the Shock-Probe test.

Author(s): Gervais NJ, Jacob S, Brake WG, Mumby DG

Physiol Behav. 2014 May 28;131:129-35 Authors: Gervais NJ, Jacob S, Brake WG, Mumby DG

Article GUID: 24768650

Conditioned mate-guarding behavior in the female rat.

Author(s): Holley A, Shalev S, Bellevue S, Pfaus JG

Physiol Behav. 2014 May 28;131:136-41 Authors: Holley A, Shalev S, Bellevue S, Pfaus JG

Article GUID: 24768651

The role of oxytocin and vasopressin in conditioned mate guarding behavior in the female rat.

Author(s): Holley A, Bellevue S, Vosberg D, Wenzel K, Roorda S, Pfaus JG

Physiol Behav. 2015 May 15;144:7-14 Authors: Holley A, Bellevue S, Vosberg D, Wenzel K, Roorda S, Pfaus JG

Article GUID: 25724299

The effects of extrinsic stress on somatic markers and behavior are dependent on animal housing conditions.

Author(s): Huzard D, Mumby DG, Sandi C, Poirier GL, van der Kooij MA

Physiol Behav. 2015 Nov 01;151:238-45 Authors: Huzard D, Mumby DG, Sandi C, Poirier GL, van der Kooij MA

Article GUID: 26220463

Inhibition of lysine-specific demethylase enzyme disrupts sexually conditioned mate guarding in the female rat.

Author(s): Holley A, Joulakian L, Wenzel K, Roorda S, Gonzalez B, Sparks L, Pfaus JG

Physiol Behav. 2018 11 01;196:78-83 Authors: Holley A, Joulakian L, Wenzel K, Roorda S, Gonzalez B, Sparks L, Pfaus JG

Article GUID: 30138634


Title:Modulatory effect of 17-β estradiol on performance of ovariectomized rats on the Shock-Probe test.
Authors:Gervais NJJacob SBrake WGMumby DG
Link:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24768650?dopt=Abstract
Category:Physiol Behav
PMID:24768650
Dept Affiliation: PSYCHOLOGY
1 Center for Studies in Behavioral Neurobiology, Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Electronic address: Nicole.Gervais@concordia.ca.
2 Center for Studies in Behavioral Neurobiology, Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Description:

Modulatory effect of 17-ß estradiol on performance of ovariectomized rats on the Shock-Probe test.

Physiol Behav. 2014 May 28;131:129-35

Authors: Gervais NJ, Jacob S, Brake WG, Mumby DG

Abstract

17-ß estradiol (E2) has been shown to modulate fear conditioning by influencing freezing behavior following re-exposure to either the conditioning context or a cue associated with shock. Fear-related behaviors other than freezing may be influenced differently by E2 replacement. Accordingly, the present study examined whether E2 modulates fear conditioning using the Shock-Probe test, which allows for the observation of multiple fear responses. Ovariectomized (OVX) rats were divided into three groups: no E2 replacement (Shock-Oil; 0.1ml/kg sesame oil), high E2 replacement (Shock-E2; 3 daily doses of 10µg/kg, s.c.), and a no shock, no E2 replacement (Naïve-oil) group. During the acquisition phase, the two shock groups (Shock-Oil and Shock-E2) demonstrated comparable fear expression on all measures. During the retention tests, rats without E2 replacement demonstrated intact contextual-fear conditioning but impaired cued-fear conditioning, while rats with E2 replacement demonstrated the opposite pattern. In the context paired with shock, the Shock-Oil group spent more time burying the probe than both the Naïve-oil group and Shock-E2 group. The Shock-E2 group avoided the probe area relative to the other two groups when tested in the context unpaired with shock. The present findings demonstrate the importance of using multiple behaviors to measure fear conditioning and suggest that high E2 replacement impairs contextual and facilitates cued fear conditioning.

PMID: 24768650 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]