Keyword search (3,448 papers available)


Implicit affect, heart rate variability, and the metabolic syndrome.

Author(s): Gouin JP, Thayer JF, Deschênes S, MacNeil S, Booij L

OBJECTIVES: Greater negative affect has been associated with increased risk for the metabolic syndrome (METs). However, all studies to date have examined this association using explicit affect measures based on subjective ratings of emotional experiences. P...

Article GUID: 33065585
Evaluation of Communication Skills Among Physicians: A Reply to the Commentary by Smith, Kovar-Gough, and Grayson-Sneed.

Author(s): Boucher VG, Gemme C, Dragomir AI, Larue F, Bacon SL, Lavoie KL

Psychosom Med. 2020 Oct 14; : Authors: Boucher VG, Gemme C, Dragomir AI, Larue F, Bacon SL, Lavoie KL PMID: 33060452 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Article GUID: 33060452
Evaluation of communication skills among physicians: A systematic review of existing assessment tools.

Author(s): Boucher VG, Gemme C, Dragomir AI, Bacon SL, Larue F, Lavoie KL

Psychosom Med. 2020 Mar 09;: Authors: Boucher VG, Gemme C, Dragomir AI, Bacon SL, Larue F, Lavoie KL

Article GUID: 32168109
Positive and Negative Affect Is Related to Experiencing Chest Pain During Exercise-Induced Myocardial Ischemia.

Author(s): Stébenne P, Bacon SL, Austin A, Paine NJ, Arsenault A, Laurin C, Meloche B, Gordon J, Dupuis J, Lavoie KL

Psychosom Med. 2017 May;79(4):395-403 Authors: Stébenne P, Bacon SL, Austin A, Paine NJ, Arsenault A, Laurin C, Meloche B, Gordon J, Dupuis J, Lavoie KL

Article GUID: 28009652
Impact of Panic Attacks on Bronchoconstriction and Subjective Distress in Asthma Patients With and Without Panic Disorder.

Author(s): Boudreau M, Bacon SL, Paine NJ, Cartier A, Trutschnigg B, Morizio A, Lavoie KL

Psychosom Med. 2017 Jun;79(5):576-584 Authors: Boudreau M, Bacon SL, Paine NJ, Cartier A, Trutschnigg B, Morizio A, Lavoie KL

Article GUID: 28033197
Title:Evaluation of communication skills among physicians: A systematic review of existing assessment tools.
Authors:Boucher VG,  Gemme C,  Dragomir AI,  Bacon SL,  Larue F,  Lavoie KL
Link:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32168109?dopt=Abstract
DOI:10.1097/PSY.0000000000000794
Category:Psychosom Med
PMID:32168109
Dept Affiliation: HKAP
1 From the Montreal Behavioural Medicine Centre (Boucher, Gemme, Dragomir, Bacon, Larue, Lavoie), Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et Services Sociaux du Nord-de-l'Île-de-Montréal (CIUSSS-NIM), Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal; Department of Psychology (Boucher, Gemme, Dragomir, Lavoie), Université du Québec à Montréal; Department of Health, Kinesiology, and Applied Physiology (Bacon, Larue), Concordia University, Montreal, Canada; and Faculty of Medicine of Montpellier (Larue), Montpellier, France.

Description:

Evaluation of communication skills among physicians: A systematic review of existing assessment tools.

Psychosom Med. 2020 Mar 09;:

Authors: Boucher VG, Gemme C, Dragomir AI, Bacon SL, Larue F, Lavoie KL

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The importance of physician training in communication skills for motivating patients to adopt a healthy lifestyle and optimize clinical outcomes is increasingly recognized. This study inventoried and systematically reviewed the psychometric properties of, and the skills assessed by, existing assessment tools used to evaluate communication skills among physicians.

METHODS: This review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD42018091932). Four databases (PUBMED, EMBASE, PsychINFO and SCOPUS) were searched up to December 2018, generating 3902 unique articles which were screened by two authors. A total of 57 articles met inclusion criteria and underwent full data extraction.

RESULTS: Forty-five different assessment tools were identified. Only 47% of the studies mentioned underlying theories or models for designing the tool. Fifteen communication skills were assessed across the tools, the five most prevalent were information giving (46%) or gathering (40%), eliciting patients' perspectives (44%), planning/goal setting (37%), and closing the session (32%). Most tools (93%) assessed communication skills using in-person role play exercises with standardized (61%) or real (32%) patients, but only 54% described the expertise of the raters who performed the evaluations. Overall, reporting of the psychometric properties of the assessment tools was poor -moderate (4.5 ± 1.3 out of 9).

CONCLUSION: Despite identifying several existing physician communication assessment tools, a high degree of heterogeneity between these tools, in terms of skills assessed and study quality, was observed and most have been poorly validated. Research is needed to rigorously develop and validate accessible, convenient, "user-friendly" easy to administer and score communication assessment tools.

PMID: 32168109 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]