1 Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. razieh.alemi@mail.mcgill.ca.
2 Centre for Research on Brain, Language and Music (CRBLM), Montreal, QC, Canada. razieh.alemi@mail.mcgill.ca.
3 International Laboratory for Brain, Music and Sound Research (BRAMS), Montreal, QC, Canada. razieh.alemi@mail.mcgill.ca.
4 Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
5 Centre for Research on Brain, Language and Music (CRBLM), Montreal, QC, Canada.
6 International Laboratory for Brain, Music and Sound Research (BRAMS), Montreal, QC, Canada.
7 Laboratory for Hearing and Cognition, Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Adaptation to pitch-altered feedback is independent of one's own voice pitch sensitivity.

Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 08; 10(1):16860

Authors: Alemi R, Lehmann A, Deroche MLD

Abstract

Monitoring voice pitch is a fine-tuned process in daily conversations as conveying accurately the linguistic and affective cues in a given utterance depends on the precise control of phonation and intonation. This monitoring is thought to depend on whether the error is treated as self-generated or externally-generated, resulting in either a correction or inflation of errors. The present study reports on two separate paradigms of adaptation to altered feedback to explore whether participants could behave in a more cohesive manner once the error is of comparable size perceptually. The vocal behavior of normal-hearing and fluent speakers was recorded in response to a personalized size of pitch shift versus a non-specific size, one semitone. The personalized size of shift was determined based on the just-noticeable difference in fundamental frequency (F0) of each participant's voice. Here we show that both tasks successfully demonstrated opposing responses to a constant and predictable F0 perturbation (on from the production onset) but these effects barely carried over once the feedback was back to normal, depicting a pattern that bears some resemblance to compensatory responses. Experiencing a F0 shift that is perceived as self-generated (because it was precisely just-noticeable) is not enough to force speakers to behave more consistently and more homogeneously in an opposing manner. On the contrary, our results suggest that the type of the response as well as the magnitude of the response do not depend in any trivial way on the sensitivity of participants to their own voice pitch. Based on this finding, we speculate that error correction could possibly occur even with a bionic ear, typically even when F0 cues are too subtle for cochlear implant users to detect accurately.

PMID: 33033324 [PubMed - in process]