Reset filters

Search publications


By keyword
By department

No publications found.

 

Coding Public Health Interventions for Health Technology Assessments: A Pilot Experience With WHO's International Classification of Health Interventions (ICHI)

Authors: Wübbeler MGeis SStojanovic JElliott LGutierrez-Ibarluzea ILenoir-Wijnkoop I


Affiliations

1 Department of Nursing Science, University of Applied Sciences, Bochum, Germany.
2 Department of Health, Kinesiology, and Applied Physiology, Faculty of Arts and Science, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
3 Montreal Behavioural Medicine Centre, CIUSSS du Nord-de-l'Ile-de-Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
4 Centre for Guidelines, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, United Kingdom.
5 Basque Foundation for Health Innovation and Research (BIOEF), Barakaldo, Spain.
6 Basque Office for HTA (Osteba), Barakaldo, Spain.
7 Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Description

Introduction: An important requirement for successful public health interventions is a standardized classification in order to make these health technologies comparable in all contexts and recognized by all parties. The WHO International Classification of Health Interventions (ICHI), including an integrated public health component, has been developed to propose such an international standard. Methods: To test (a) the translation of public health interventions to ICHI codes and (b) the technical handling and general coding in public health, we used a set of public health interventions from a recent cross-sectional survey among Health Technology Assessment professionals. Results: Our study showed that handling of the ICHI interface is stable, that there is a need for specificity and adequate detail of intervention descriptions and desired outcomes to code adequately with ICHI and that the professional background of the coder, as well as his/her sex might influence the selection of codes. Conclusion: International Classification of Health Interventions provides a good coverage of public health interventions. However, the broader character of system wide interventions, often involving a variety of institutions and stakeholders, may present a challenge to the application of ICHI coding. Based on this experience, we would tailor future surveys more specifically to the needs of the classification and we advise training for health professionals before coding with ICHI. Standards of reporting will likely strengthen insights about the efficiency of primary prevention interventions and thus benefit long-term health of populations and structured HTA reporting process.


Keywords: Health Technology AssessmentInternational Classification of Health Interventionscodingfeasibility evaluationpublic health intervention


Links

PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34222165/

DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.620637