Keyword search (4,163 papers available)

"Deroche M" Authored Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 Segregation of competing voices by their fundamental frequency relies on low-frequency regions Calinescu C; Deroche M; 41817225
PSYCHOLOGY
2 Psychophysical evidence of the harmonic cancellation process and its relationship to pitch sensitivity and voice segregation Deroche M; Montagnese J; Khoury K; Iuliano R; Alemi R; 41263633
PSYCHOLOGY
3 Reduced Eye Blinking During Sentence Listening Reflects Increased Cognitive Load in Challenging Auditory Conditions Coupal P; Zhang Y; Deroche M; 40910460
PSYCHOLOGY
4 Pupillometry reveals effects of pitch manipulation within and across words on listening effort and short-term memory Zhang Y; Sares A; Delage A; Lehmann A; Deroche M; 39349635
CONCORDIA
5 Differences Between French and English in the Use of Suprasegmental Cues for the Short-Term Recall of Word Lists Lew EC; Sares A; Gilbert AC; Zhang Y; Lehmann A; Deroche M; 39320319
PSYCHOLOGY
6 OFC neurons do not represent the negative value of a conditioned inhibitor Esber GR; Usypchuk A; Saini S; Deroche M; Iordanova MD; Schoenbaum G; 38042330
CONCORDIA
7 Audiovisual integration in children with cochlear implants revealed through EEG and fNIRS Alemi R; Wolfe J; Neumann S; Manning J; Towler W; Koirala N; Gracco VL; Deroche M; 37989460
PSYCHOLOGY
8 Motor Processing in Children With Cochlear Implants as Assessed by Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Alemi R; Wolfe J; Neumann S; Manning J; Hanna L; Towler W; Wilson C; Bien A; Miller S; Schafer E; Gemignani J; Koirala N; Gracco VL; Deroche M; 37977135
PSYCHOLOGY
9 Factors Associated with Speech-Recognition Performance in School-Aged Children with Cochlear Implants and Early Auditory-Verbal Intervention Wolfe J; Deroche M; Neumann S; Hanna L; Towler W; Wilson C; Bien AG; Miller S; Schafer EC; Gracco V; 34847584
PSYCHOLOGY

 

Title:Factors Associated with Speech-Recognition Performance in School-Aged Children with Cochlear Implants and Early Auditory-Verbal Intervention
Authors:Wolfe JDeroche MNeumann SHanna LTowler WWilson CBien AGMiller SSchafer ECGracco V
Link:pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34847584/
DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1730413
Publication:Journal of the American Academy of Audiology
Keywords:
PMID:34847584 Category: Date Added:2021-12-01
Dept Affiliation: PSYCHOLOGY
1 Hearts for Hearing Foundation, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
2 Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.
3 University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
4 Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
5 Department of Audiology & Speech-Language Pathology, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas.
6 Haskins Laboratories, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
7 School of Communication Sciences & Disorders McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Description:

<strong>Background:</strong> Considerable variability exists in the speech recognition abilities achieved by children with cochlear implants (CIs) due to varying demographic and performance variables including language abilities.

<strong>Purpose:</strong> This article examines the factors associated with speech recognition performance of school-aged children with CIs who were grouped by language ability.

<strong>Research design:</strong> This is a single-center cross-sectional study with repeated measures for subjects across two language groups.

<strong>Study sample:</strong> Participants included two groups of school-aged children, ages 7 to 17 years, who received unilateral or bilateral CIs by 4 years of age. The High Language group (N = 26) had age-appropriate spoken-language abilities, and the Low Language group (N = 24) had delays in their spoken-language abilities.

<strong>Data collection and analysis:</strong> Group comparisons were conducted to examine the impact of demographic characteristics on word recognition in quiet and sentence recognition in quiet and noise.

<strong>Results:</strong> Speech recognition in quiet and noise was significantly poorer in the Low Language compared with the High Language group. Greater hours of implant use and better adherence to auditory-verbal (AV) therapy appointments were associated with higher speech recognition in quiet and noise.

<strong>Conclusion:</strong> To ensure maximal speech recognition in children with low-language outcomes, professionals should develop strategies to ensure that families support full-time CI use and have the means to consistently attend AV appointments.




BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University