Keyword search (4,163 papers available)

"Deroche M" Authored Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 Segregation of competing voices by their fundamental frequency relies on low-frequency regions Calinescu C; Deroche M; 41817225
PSYCHOLOGY
2 Psychophysical evidence of the harmonic cancellation process and its relationship to pitch sensitivity and voice segregation Deroche M; Montagnese J; Khoury K; Iuliano R; Alemi R; 41263633
PSYCHOLOGY
3 Reduced Eye Blinking During Sentence Listening Reflects Increased Cognitive Load in Challenging Auditory Conditions Coupal P; Zhang Y; Deroche M; 40910460
PSYCHOLOGY
4 Pupillometry reveals effects of pitch manipulation within and across words on listening effort and short-term memory Zhang Y; Sares A; Delage A; Lehmann A; Deroche M; 39349635
CONCORDIA
5 Differences Between French and English in the Use of Suprasegmental Cues for the Short-Term Recall of Word Lists Lew EC; Sares A; Gilbert AC; Zhang Y; Lehmann A; Deroche M; 39320319
PSYCHOLOGY
6 OFC neurons do not represent the negative value of a conditioned inhibitor Esber GR; Usypchuk A; Saini S; Deroche M; Iordanova MD; Schoenbaum G; 38042330
CONCORDIA
7 Audiovisual integration in children with cochlear implants revealed through EEG and fNIRS Alemi R; Wolfe J; Neumann S; Manning J; Towler W; Koirala N; Gracco VL; Deroche M; 37989460
PSYCHOLOGY
8 Motor Processing in Children With Cochlear Implants as Assessed by Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Alemi R; Wolfe J; Neumann S; Manning J; Hanna L; Towler W; Wilson C; Bien A; Miller S; Schafer E; Gemignani J; Koirala N; Gracco VL; Deroche M; 37977135
PSYCHOLOGY
9 Factors Associated with Speech-Recognition Performance in School-Aged Children with Cochlear Implants and Early Auditory-Verbal Intervention Wolfe J; Deroche M; Neumann S; Hanna L; Towler W; Wilson C; Bien AG; Miller S; Schafer EC; Gracco V; 34847584
PSYCHOLOGY

 

Title:Segregation of competing voices by their fundamental frequency relies on low-frequency regions
Authors:Calinescu CDeroche M
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41817225/
DOI:10.1121/10.0043005
Publication:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Keywords:
PMID:41817225 Category: Date Added:2026-03-12
Dept Affiliation: PSYCHOLOGY
1 Laboratory for Hearing and Cognition, Psychology Department, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke St. West, Montreal, Québec H4B 1R6, Canada.

Description:

A difference in fundamental frequency (?F0) between two voices provides considerable help for listeners to segregate one from the other perceptually. Past studies have found that the ?F0 benefit relies on partials of low rank. Here, we questioned whether this observation could partly be due to spectral glimpsing. Four experiments measured speech reception thresholds for a target voice against an interfering voice (experiments 1 and 2) or against buzzes (experiments 3 and 4) with flattened F0 patterns. In experiments 1 and 3, the target F0 was fixed (at 90 Hz) and the masker F0 was raised. In experiments 2 and 4, the masker F0 was fixed (at 90 Hz) and the target F0 was raised. Furthermore, the ?F0 was (1) applied uniformly across the spectrum, (2) only available in low frequencies, (3) only available in high frequencies, or (4) swapped between low and high frequencies. Results confirmed that glimpsing plays an increasing role when the masker F0 is increased. The benefit relied primarily on frequencies below 800 Hz, but this depended somewhat on the design and on the masker type. High-frequency harmonics contributed more with buzzes, and F0 inconsistencies across channels were more detrimental at large ?F0s.





BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University