BookR: School of Health Core Facilities Booking
PubMed Publications| Keyword search (4,164 papers available) |  |
"Matthews HD" Authored Publications:
| Title | Authors | PubMed ID | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Geological Net Zero and the need for disaggregated accounting for carbon sinks | Allen MR; Frame DJ; Friedlingstein P; Gillett NP; Grassi G; Gregory JM; Hare W; House J; Huntingford C; Jenkins S; Jones CD; Knutti R; Lowe JA; Matthews HD; Meinshausen M; Meinshausen N; Peters GP; Plattner GK; Raper S; Rogelj J; Stott PA; Solomon S; Stocker TF; Weaver AJ; Zickfeld K; | 39557072 PHYSICS |
| 2 | Perceptions of carbon dioxide emission reductions and future warming among climate experts | Wynes S; Davis SJ; Dickau M; Ly S; Maibach E; Rogelj J; Zickfeld K; Matthews HD; | 39280638 CONCORDIA |
| 3 | Digitizing natureGaia's Web Karen Bakker MIT Press, 2024. 288 pp | Garard J; Matthews HD; | 38574131 CONCORDIA |
| 4 | Accounting for the climate benefit of temporary carbon storage in nature | Matthews HD; Zickfeld K; Koch A; Luers A; | 37679349 CONCORDIA |
| 5 | Mothers of disabled infants had higher cortisol levels in a free-ranging group of Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata) | Turner SE; Fedigan LM; Joyce MM; Matthews HD; Moriarity RJ; Nobuhara H; Nobuhara T; Stewart BM; Shimizu K; | 37189289 CONCORDIA |
| 6 | Moderate support for the use of digital tracking to support climate-mitigation strategies | Garard J; Wood SLR; Sabet-Kassouf N; Ventimiglia A; Matthews HD; Ubalijoro É; Chaudhari K; Ivanova M; Luers AL; | 36128017 ENCS |
| 7 | Current global efforts are insufficient to limit warming to 1.5°C | Matthews HD; Wynes S; | 35737785 GEOGRAPHY |
| 8 | Exposure to excessive heat and impacts on labour productivity linked to cumulative CO2 emissions. | Chavaillaz Y, Roy P, Partanen AI, Da Silva L, Bresson É, Mengis N, Chaumont D, Matthews HD | 31548555 GEOGRAPHY |
| 9 | A real-time Global Warming Index. | Haustein K, Allen MR, Forster PM, Otto FEL, Mitchell DM, Matthews HD, Frame DJ | 29133863 PHYSICS |
| Title: | Perceptions of carbon dioxide emission reductions and future warming among climate experts | ||||
| Authors: | Wynes S, Davis SJ, Dickau M, Ly S, Maibach E, Rogelj J, Zickfeld K, Matthews HD | ||||
| Link: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39280638/ | ||||
| DOI: | 10.1038/s43247-024-01661-8 | ||||
| Publication: | Communications earth & environment | ||||
| Keywords: | Environmental studies; Projection and prediction; | ||||
| PMID: | 39280638 | Category: | Date Added: | 2024-09-17 | |
| Dept Affiliation: |
CONCORDIA
1 Department of Geography, Planning & Environment, Concordia University, Montréal, QC Canada. 2 Department of Geography and Environmental Management, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON Canada. 3 Dept. of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA USA. 4 Department of Communication, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA USA. 5 Grantham Institute Climate Change and Environment, Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, London, UK. 6 Energy Climate and Environment Programme, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria. 7 Department of Geography, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC Canada. |
||||
Description: |
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) employs emission scenarios to explore a range of future climate outcomes but refrains from assigning probabilities to individual scenarios. However, IPCC authors have their own views on the likelihood of different climate outcomes, which are valuable to understand because authors possess both expert insight and considerable influence. Here we report the results of a survey of 211 IPCC authors about the likelihood of four key climate outcomes. We found that most authors are skeptical that warming will be limited to the Paris targets of well below 2 °C, but are more optimistic that net zero CO2 emissions will be reached during the second half of this century. When asked about the beliefs of their peers, author responses showed strong correlations between personal and peer beliefs, suggesting that participants with extreme beliefs perceive their own estimates as closer to the community average than they actually are. |
