Keyword search (4,163 papers available)

"Shizgal P" Authored Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 Discriminative properties of rewarding electrical brain stimulation Pacheco-Gomez BL; Zepeda-Ruiz WA; Velazquez-Lopez D; Shizgal P; Velazquez-Martinez DN; 40015584
CSBN
2 Does phasic dopamine release cause policy updates? Carter F; Cossette MP; Trujillo-Pisanty I; Pallikaras V; Breton YA; Conover K; Caplan J; Solis P; Voisard J; Yaksich A; Shizgal P; 38039083
PSYCHOLOGY
3 Dopamine and Beyond: Implications of Psychophysical Studies of Intracranial Self-Stimulation for the Treatment of Depression Pallikaras V; Shizgal P; 36009115
PSYCHOLOGY
4 The Convergence Model of Brain Reward Circuitry: Implications for Relief of Treatment-Resistant Depression by Deep-Brain Stimulation of the Medial Forebrain Bundle Pallikaras V; Shizgal P; 35431828
PSYCHOLOGY
5 The trade-off between pulse duration and power in optical excitation of midbrain dopamine neurons approximates Bloch's law Pallikaras V; Carter F; Velazquez-Martinez DN; Arvanitogiannis A; Shizgal P; 34864162
PSYCHOLOGY
6 Dopamine neurons do not constitute an obligatory stage in the final common path for the evaluation and pursuit of brain stimulation reward. Trujillo-Pisanty I, Conover K, Solis P, Palacios D, Shizgal P 32502210
CSBN
7 The priming effect of food persists following blockade of dopamine receptors. Evangelista C, Hantson A, Shams WM, Almey A, Pileggi M, Voisard JR, Boulos V, Al-Qadri Y, Gonzalez Cautela BV, Zhou FX, Duchemin J, Habrich A, Tito N, Koumrouyan RA, Patel S, Lorenc V, Gagne C, El Oufi K, Shizgal P, Brake WG 31350860
CSBN
8 Learning to use past evidence in a sophisticated world model. Ahilan S, Solomon RB, Breton YA, Conover K, Niyogi RK, Shizgal P, Dayan P 31233559
CSBN
9 Ventral Midbrain NMDA Receptor Blockade: From Enhanced Reward and Dopamine Inactivation. Hernandez G, Cossette MP, Shizgal P, Rompré PP 27616984
PSYCHOLOGY
10 Valuation of opportunity costs by rats working for rewarding electrical brain stimulation. Solomon RB, Conover K, Shizgal P 28841663
PSYCHOLOGY
11 17β-estradiol locally increases phasic dopamine release in the dorsal striatum. Shams WM, Cossette MP, Shizgal P, Brake WG 29175028
CSBN
12 Some work and some play: microscopic and macroscopic approaches to labor and leisure. Niyogi RK, Shizgal P, Dayan P 25474151
CSBN
13 Robust optical fiber patch-cords for in vivo optogenetic experiments in rats. Trujillo-Pisanty I, Sanio C, Chaudhri N, Shizgal P 26150997
CSBN
14 The neural substrates for the rewarding and dopamine-releasing effects of medial forebrain bundle stimulation have partially discrepant frequency responses. Cossette MP, Conover K, Shizgal P 26477378
CSBN
15 The Effects of Electrical and Optical Stimulation of Midbrain Dopaminergic Neurons on Rat 50-kHz Ultrasonic Vocalizations. Scardochio T, Trujillo-Pisanty I, Conover K, Shizgal P, Clarke PB 26696851
CSBN

 

Title:Valuation of opportunity costs by rats working for rewarding electrical brain stimulation.
Authors:Solomon RBConover KShizgal P
Link:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28841663?dopt=Abstract
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0182120
Publication:PloS one
Keywords:
PMID:28841663 Category:PLoS One Date Added:2019-06-20
Dept Affiliation: PSYCHOLOGY
1 Centre for Studies in Behavioural Neurobiology / Groupe de recherche en neurobiologie comportementale, Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Description:

Valuation of opportunity costs by rats working for rewarding electrical brain stimulation.

PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0182120

Authors: Solomon RB, Conover K, Shizgal P

Abstract

Pursuit of one goal typically precludes simultaneous pursuit of another. Thus, each exclusive activity entails an "opportunity cost:" the forgone benefits from the next-best activity eschewed. The present experiment estimates, in laboratory rats, the function that maps objective opportunity costs into subjective ones. In an operant chamber, rewarding electrical brain stimulation was delivered when the cumulative time a lever had been depressed reached a criterion duration. The value of the activities forgone during this duration is the opportunity cost of the electrical reward. We determined which of four functions best describes how objective opportunity costs, expressed as the required duration of lever depression, are translated into their subjective equivalents. The simplest account is the identity function, which equates subjective and objective opportunity costs. A variant of this function called the "sigmoidal-slope function," converges on the identity function at longer durations but deviates from it at shorter durations. The sigmoidal-slope function has the form of a hockey stick. The flat "blade" denotes a range over which opportunity costs are subjectively equivalent; these durations are too short to allow substitution of more beneficial activities. The blade extends into an upward-curving portion over which costs become discriminable and finally into the straight "handle," over which objective and subjective costs match. The two remaining functions are based on hyperbolic and exponential temporal discounting, respectively. The results are best described by the sigmoidal-slope function. That this is so suggests that different principles of intertemporal choice are involved in the evaluation of time spent working for a reward or waiting for its delivery. The subjective opportunity-cost function plays a key role in the evaluation and selection of goals. An accurate description of its form and parameters is essential to successful modeling and prediction of instrumental performance and reward-related decision making.

PMID: 28841663 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]





BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University