Keyword search (4,163 papers available)

"Communication" Keyword-tagged Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 Exosome Innovations in Ophthalmology and Sjögren s Syndrome Wu KY; Dave A; Nirwal GK; Giunta M; Nguyen VDH; Tran SD; 40360847
CONCORDIA
2 A synthetic model of bioinspired liposomes to study cancer-cell derived extracellular vesicles and their uptake by recipient cells López RR; Ben El Khyat CZ; Chen Y; Tsering T; Dickinson K; Bustamante P; Erzingatzian A; Bartolomucci A; Ferrier ST; Douanne N; Mounier C; Stiharu I; Nerguizian V; Burnier JV; 40069225
ENCS
3 "How do we do that?" An analysis of TikToks by lesbians over age 30 representing sexual identity, lived experience over time, and solidarity Jamet-Lange H; Duguay S; 38907626
CONCORDIA
4 Assessing pragmatics in early childhood with the Language Use Inventory across seven languages Pesco D; O' Neill DK; 37408974
EDUCATION
5 How to present work productivity loss results from clinical trials for patients and caregivers? A mixed methods approach L' Heureux J; McTaggart-Cowan H; Johns G; Chen L; Steiner T; Tocher P; Sun H; Zhang W; 37276772
JMSB
6 The association between information and communication technologies, loneliness and social connectedness: A scoping review Petersen B; Khalili-Mahani N; Murphy C; Sawchuk K; Phillips N; Li KZH; Hebblethwaite S; 37034933
PSYCHOLOGY
7 Double-Bind of Recruitment of Older Adults Into Studies of Successful Aging via Assistive Information and Communication Technologies: Mapping Review Khalili-Mahani N; Sawchuk K; 36563033
CONCORDIA
8 Assessing Physician's Motivational Communication Skills: 5-Step Mixed Methods Development Study of the Motivational Communication Competency Assessment Test Gosselin Boucher V; Bacon S; Voisard B; Dragomir AI; Gemme C; Larue F; Labbé S; Szczepanik G; Corace K; Campbell T; Vallis M; Garber G; Rouleau C; Diodati JG; Rabi D; Sultan S; Lavoie K; 35749167
HKAP
9 Persuasive Features of Scientific Explanations: Explanatory Schemata of Physical and Psychosocial Phenomena Jordan Richard Schoenherr 34552522
PSYCHOLOGY
10 COVID-19 Experiences and Social Distancing: Insights From the Theory of Planned Behavior Frounfelker RL; Santavicca T; Li ZY; Miconi D; Venkatesh V; Rousseau C; 34074154
CONCORDIA
11 Socio-demographic, social, cognitive, and emotional correlates of adherence to physical distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. Gouin JP, MacNeil S, Switzer A, Carrese-Chacra E, Durif F, Knäuper B 33464556
CONCORDIA
12 Pantomime (Not Silent Gesture) in Multimodal Communication: Evidence From Children's Narratives. Marentette P, Furman R, Suvanto ME, Nicoladis E 33329222
PSYCHOLOGY
13 What Media Helps, What Media Hurts: A Mixed Methods Survey Study of Coping with COVID-19 Using the Media Repertoire Framework and the Appraisal Theory of Stress Pahayahay A; Khalili-Mahani N; 32701459
PERFORM
14 The Value in Science-Art Partnerships for Science Education and Science Communication. Zaelzer C 32616625
CONCORDIA
15 High-risk environments promote chemical disturbance signalling among socially familiar Trinidadian guppies. Crane AL, Feyten LEA, Ramnarine IW, Brown GE 32296954
BIOLOGY
16 An international Delphi consensus study to define motivational communication in the context of developing a training program for physicians. Dragomir AI, Boucher VG, Bacon SL, Gemme C, Szczepanik G, Corace K, Campbell TS, Vallis MT, Garber G, Rouleau C, Rabi D, Diodati JG, Ghali W, Lavoie KL 32145022
HKAP
17 Exploring the use of smartphones and tablets among people with visual impairments: Are mainstream devices replacing the use of traditional visual aids? Martiniello N, Eisenbarth W, Lehane C, Johnson A, Wittich W 31697612
PSYCHOLOGY
18 Some Metabolites Act as Second Messengers in Yeast Chronological Aging. Mohammad K, Dakik P, Medkour Y, McAuley M, Mitrofanova D, Titorenko VI 29543708
BIOLOGY
19 To Each Stress Its Own Screen: A Cross-Sectional Survey of the Patterns of Stress and Various Screen Uses in Relation to Self-Admitted Screen Addiction Khalili-Mahani N; Smyrnova A; Kakinami L; 30938685
PERFORM

 

Title:Exploring the use of smartphones and tablets among people with visual impairments: Are mainstream devices replacing the use of traditional visual aids?
Authors:Martiniello NEisenbarth WLehane CJohnson AWittich W
Link:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31697612?dopt=Abstract
DOI:10.1080/10400435.2019.1682084
Publication:Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA
Keywords:computer accessinformation technology and telecommunicationsuniversal designusabilityvisual impairment
PMID:31697612 Category:Assist Technol Date Added:2019-11-08
Dept Affiliation: PSYCHOLOGY
1 School of Optometry, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
2 Research Services, CRIR/Centre de réadaptation MAB-Mackay du CIUSSS du Centre-Ouest-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
3 Center for Applied Vision Science, Munich University of Applied Sciences, Munich, Germany.
4 Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
5 Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Description:

Exploring the use of smartphones and tablets among people with visual impairments: Are mainstream devices replacing the use of traditional visual aids?

Assist Technol. 2019 Nov 07;:1-12

Authors: Martiniello N, Eisenbarth W, Lehane C, Johnson A, Wittich W

Abstract

Smartphones and tablets incorporate built-in accessibility features, but little is known about their impact within the visually impaired population. This study explored the use of smartphones and tablets, the degree to which they replace traditional visual aids, and factors influencing these decisions. Data were collected through an anonymous online survey targeted toward visually impaired participants above the age of 18, whom had been using a smartphone or tablet for at least three months. Among participants (n = 466), 87.4% felt that mainstream devices are replacing traditional solutions. This is especially true for object identification, navigation, requesting sighted help, listening to audiobooks, reading eBooks and optical character recognition. In these cases, at least two-thirds of respondents indicated that mainstream devices were replacing traditional tools most or all of the time. Users across all ages with higher self-reported proficiency were more likely to select a mainstream device over a traditional solution. Our results suggest that mainstream devices are frequently used amongst visually impaired adults in place of or in combination with traditional assistive aids for specific tasks; however, traditional devices are still preferable for certain tasks, including those requiring extensive typing or editing. This provides important context to designers and rehabilitation personnel in understanding the factors influencing device usage.

PMID: 31697612 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]





BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University