Keyword search (4,163 papers available)

"chronic low back pain" Keyword-tagged Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 The Effect of a 10-Week Electromyostimulation Intervention with the StimaWELL 120MTRS System on Multifidus Morphology and Function in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial Wolfe D; Rosenstein B; Dover G; Boily M; Fortin M; 41283552
SOH
2 Impact of different acute low back pain definitions on the predictors and on the risk of transition to chronic low back pain: a prospective longitudinal cohort study Osagie RO; Tufa I; Angarita-Fonseca A; Pagé MG; Lacasse A; Stone LS; Rainville P; Roy M; Tétreault P; Fortin M; Léonard G; Massé-Alarie H; Roy JS; Grant AV; Meloto CB; 40663110
HKAP
3 Relationship Between Lumbar Multifidus Morphometry and Pain/Disability in Individuals With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain After Considering Demographics, Fear-Avoidance Beliefs, Insomnia, and Spinal Degenerative Changes Pinto SM; Cheung JPY; Samartzis D; Karppinen J; Zheng YP; Pang MYC; Fortin M; Wong AYL; 40376565
SOH
4 Low Back Pain During and After Spaceflight: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis Ceniza-Bordallo G; Zimmermann E; Vigouroux M; Niburski K; Fortin M; Ouellet J; Cata JP; Ingelmo PM; 39660277
HKAP
5 The Immediate Effect of a Single Treatment of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation with the StimaWELL 120MTRS System on Multifidus Stiffness in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain Wolfe D; Dover G; Boily M; Fortin M; 39594260
SOH
6 The effect of EMS, IFC, and TENS on patient-reported outcome measures for chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis Wolfe D; Rosenstein B; Fortin M; 38979440
HKAP
7 The Effect of Transcutaneous Electrotherapy on Lumbar Range of Motion and Paraspinal Muscle Characteristics in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Wolfe D; Rosenstein B; Fortin M; 37510796
PERFORM
8 Low back pain definitions: effect on patient inclusion and clinical profiles Massé-Alarie H; Angarita-Fonseca A; Lacasse A; Pagé MG; Tétreault P; Fortin M; Léonard G; Stone LS; Roy JS; 35356510
HKAP

 

Title:The Immediate Effect of a Single Treatment of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation with the StimaWELL 120MTRS System on Multifidus Stiffness in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain
Authors:Wolfe DDover GBoily MFortin M
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39594260/
DOI:10.3390/diagnostics14222594
Publication:Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
Keywords:chronic low back painlumbar multifidusshear-wave elastography
PMID:39594260 Category: Date Added:2024-11-27
Dept Affiliation: SOH
1 Department of Health, Kinesiology, and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC H4B 1R6, Canada.
2 School of Health, Concordia University, Montreal, QC H4B 1R6, Canada.
3 McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada.
4 Centre de Réadaptation Constance-Lethbridge du CIUSSS du Centre-Ouest de l'Île-de-Montreal, Montreal, QC H4B 1T3, Canada.

Description:

Background/objectives: Individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP) have altered lumbar multifidus stiffness properties compared to healthy controls. Although neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) application to the multifidus might affect stiffness, this has never been investigated. The aims of this study were to examine the effect of a single NMES treatment on multifidus stiffness and pain intensity in CLBP patients.

Methods: 30 participants (13 male, 17 female) were randomized to one of two intervention ('phasic' and 'combined') protocols with the StimaWELL 120MTRS system. Multifidus stiffness at L4 and L5 was measured via shear-wave elastography (SWE) at rest and in standing prior to, and 15 min after, a 20 min NMES treatment. Pain intensity was measured pre- and post-treatment with the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS).

Results: There were significant increases in resting shear modulus at right L4 (p = 0.001) and bilaterally at L5 (p = 0.017; p = 0.020) in the 'combined' intervention group, and a significant between-group difference at right L4 (p < 0.001). There were significant decreases in standing shear modulus at right L4 (p = 0.015) and left L5 (p = 0.036) in the 'combined' intervention group, and a significant between-group difference at left L5 (p = 0.016). Both groups experienced significant decreases in pain intensity (MD combined group = 1.12, 95% CI [0.34, 1.90], p = 0.011) (MD phasic group = 1.42, 95% CI [0.68, 2.16], p = 0.001).

Conclusions: There were multiple significant changes in multifidus stiffness in the combined group, but not in the phasic group. Both groups experienced significant decreases in low back pain intensity.





BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University