Keyword search (3,448 papers available)


Naïve Theories of Biology, Physics, and Psychology in Children with ASD.

Author(s): Poulin-Dubois D, Dutemple E, Burnside K

Theory of mind is defined as the understanding that mental states predict and explain people's behaviors. It develops around the age of 4 but seems to remain deficient in people with ASD, whereas other forms of naïve understanding remain intact. This st...

Article GUID: 33385282

Infants Generalize Beliefs Across Individuals.

Author(s): Burnside K, Neumann C, Poulin-Dubois D

It has been argued that infants possess a rich, sophisticated theory of mind (ToM) that is only revealed with tasks based on spontaneous responses. A mature (ToM) implies the understanding that mental states are person specific. Previous studies on infants&...

Article GUID: 33071864

Social orienting predicts implicit false belief understanding in preschoolers.

Author(s): Burnside K, Wright K, Poulin-Dubois D

J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 11;175:67-79 Authors: Burnside K, Wright K, Poulin-Dubois D

Article GUID: 30025256


Title:Naïve Theories of Biology, Physics, and Psychology in Children with ASD.
Authors:Poulin-Dubois DDutemple EBurnside K
Link:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33385282
DOI:10.1007/s10803-020-04813-9
Category:J Autism Dev Disord
PMID:33385282
Dept Affiliation: PSYCHOLOGY
1 Department of Psychology, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke St. West, Montréal, Québec, Canada. diane.poulindubois@concordia.ca.
2 Department of Psychology, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke St. West, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Description:

Naïve Theories of Biology, Physics, and Psychology in Children with ASD.

J Autism Dev Disord. 2021 Jan 01; :

Authors: Poulin-Dubois D, Dutemple E, Burnside K

Abstract

Theory of mind is defined as the understanding that mental states predict and explain people's behaviors. It develops around the age of 4 but seems to remain deficient in people with ASD, whereas other forms of naïve understanding remain intact. This study compares children with ASD to neurotypical children on tasks measuring naïve psychology, physics, and biology (biological parts). Results suggest that children with ASD only underperform on an implicit false belief task. Performances in naïve biology and physics were equivalent across the two groups and uncorrelated to performance on the false belief task. This confirms that naïve physics and biological reasoning are intact in children with ASD but that tracking false beliefs is challenging for this population.

PMID: 33385282 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]