Keyword search (3,448 papers available)


Potential Movement Corridors and High Road-Kill Likelihood do not Spatially Coincide for Felids in Brazil: Implications for Road Mitigation.

Author(s): Cerqueira RC, Leonard PB, da Silva LG, Bager A, Clevenger AP, Jaeger JAG, Grilo C

The negative effects of roads on wildlife populations are a growing concern. Movement corridors and road-kill data are typically used to prioritize road segments for mitigation measures. Some research suggests that locations where animals move across roads ...

Article GUID: 33469694

What attributes are relevant for drainage culverts to serve as efficient road crossing structures for mammals?

Author(s): Brunen B, Daguet C, Jaeger JAG

J Environ Manage. 2020 Aug 15;268:110423 Authors: Brunen B, Daguet C, Jaeger JAG

Article GUID: 32510423

An adaptive plan for prioritizing road sections for fencing to reduce animal mortality.

Author(s): Spanowicz AG, Teixeira FZ, Jaeger JAG

Conserv Biol. 2020 Mar 30;: Authors: Spanowicz AG, Teixeira FZ, Jaeger JAG

Article GUID: 32227646

How do landscape context and fences influence roadkill locations of small and medium-sized mammals?

Author(s): Plante J, Jaeger JAG, Desrochers A

J Environ Manage. 2019 Apr 01;235:511-520 Authors: Plante J, Jaeger JAG, Desrochers A

Article GUID: 30711836

Road mortality locations of small and medium-sized mammals along a partly-fenced highway in Quebec, Canada, 2012-2015.

Author(s): Plante J, Bélanger-Smith K, Spanowicz AG, Clevenger AP, Jaeger JAG

Data Brief. 2018 Dec;21:1209-1215 Authors: Plante J, Bélanger-Smith K, Spanowicz AG, Clevenger AP, Jaeger JAG

Article GUID: 30456234


Title:An adaptive plan for prioritizing road sections for fencing to reduce animal mortality.
Authors:Spanowicz AGTeixeira FZJaeger JAG
Link:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32227646?dopt=Abstract
DOI:10.1111/cobi.13502
Category:Conserv Biol
PMID:32227646
Dept Affiliation: GEOGRAPHY
1 Department of Geography, Planning and Environment, Concordia University Montreal, 1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd. West, Suite H1255, Montréal, Québec, H3G 1M8, Canada.
2 Road and Railroad Ecology Research Group (NERF-UFRGS), Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Av. Bento Gonçalves, 9500, Porto Alegre, RS, CEP 91501-970, Brazil.
3 Ecology Graduate Program, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Av. Bento Gonçalves, 9500, Porto Alegre, RS, CEP 91501-970, Brazil.
4 Loyola Sustainability Research Centre, Concordia University Montreal, 7141 Sherbrooke St. West, Montréal, Québec, H4B 1R6, Canada.

Description:

An adaptive plan for prioritizing road sections for fencing to reduce animal mortality.

Conserv Biol. 2020 Mar 30;:

Authors: Spanowicz AG, Teixeira FZ, Jaeger JAG

Abstract

Mortality of animals on roads is a critical threat to many wildlife populations, and is poised to increase strongly because of ongoing and planned road construction. If these new roads cannot be avoided, effective mitigation measures will be necessary to stop biodiversity decline. Fencing along roads effectively reduces roadkill and is often used in combination with wildlife passages. Because fencing the entire road is not always possible due to financial constraints, high-frequency roadkill areas are often identified to inform the placement of fencing. We devised an adaptive fence-implementation plan to prioritize road sections for fencing. In this framework, areas along roads of high, moderate, and low levels of animal mortality (respectively roadkill hotspots, warmspots, and coldspots) are identified at multiple scales (i.e., in circles of different diameters [200-2000 m] in which mortality frequency is measured). Fence deployment is based on the relationship between the amount of fencing being added to the road, starting with roadkill hotspots, and potential reduction in road mortality (displayed in mortality-reduction graphs). We applied our approach to empirical and simulated spatial patterns of wildlife-vehicle collisions. The scale used for analysis affected the number and spatial extent of roadkill hot-, warm-, and coldspots. At fine scales (e.g., 200 m), more hotspots were identified than at coarse scales (e.g., 2000 m), but combined the fine-scale hotspots covered less road and less fencing was needed to reduce road mortality. However, many short fences may be less effective in practice due to a fence-end effect (i.e., animals moving around the fence more easily), resulting in a trade-off between few long and many short fences, which we call the FLOMS (few-long-or-many-short) fences trade-off. Thresholds in the mortality-reduction graphs occurred for some roadkill patterns, but not for others. Thresholds may be useful to consider when determining road-mitigation targets. The existence of thresholds at multiple scales and the FLOMS trade-off have important implications for biodiversity conservation. Article impact statement: Mortality-reduction graphs show by how much fencing can reduce roadkill at multiple scales and serve to identify trade-offs and thresholds. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

PMID: 32227646 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]