Keyword search (3,449 papers available)


The Effectiveness of Dance Therapy as an Adjunct to Rehabilitation of Adults With a Physical Disability.

Author(s): Swaine B, Poncet F, Lachance B, Proulx-Goulet C, Bergeron V, Brousse É, Lamoureux J, McKinley P...

Background/Objective: To determine the added benefit on participants' mobility and participation of a 12-week dance therapy (DT) intervention combined with usual physical rehabilitation for adu...

Article GUID: 32982831
Title:The Effectiveness of Dance Therapy as an Adjunct to Rehabilitation of Adults With a Physical Disability.
Authors:Swaine B,  Poncet F,  Lachance B,  Proulx-Goulet C,  Bergeron V,  Brousse É,  Lamoureux J,  McKinley P
Link:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32982831
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01963
Category:Front Psychol
PMID:32982831
Dept Affiliation: PSYCHOLOGY
1 School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
2 Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montréal, QC, Canada.
3 Institut Universitaire sur la Réadaptation en Déficience Physique de Montréal (IURDPM), CIUSSS du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
4 Laboratory for Adult Development and Cognitive Aging, Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
5 School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.

Description:

The Effectiveness of Dance Therapy as an Adjunct to Rehabilitation of Adults With a Physical Disability.

Front Psychol. 2020; 11:1963

Authors: Swaine B, Poncet F, Lachance B, Proulx-Goulet C, Bergeron V, Brousse É, Lamoureux J, McKinley P

Abstract

Background/Objective: To determine the added benefit on participants' mobility and participation of a 12-week dance therapy (DT) intervention combined with usual physical rehabilitation for adults with varied physical disabilities. Their appreciation of DT was also explored. Methods: We conducted a quasi-experimental study pre-post test with a nonequivalent control group and repeated measurements pre, post, and at a 3-month follow-up. Results: Although participants in both groups significantly improved over time (at 12 weeks and at follow-up) compared to baseline on mobility (timed up and go, TUG) and participation (e.g., Life-H scores and number of leisure activities), treatment effect analysis using propensity score matching showed no significant treatment effect of DT. The TUG scores showed the best promise of a treatment effect. DT participants' Flow State Scale scores significantly improved (p < 0.01) for 5/9 dimensions of flow (being in control, loss of self-consciousness), and they all recommended DT. Conclusion: This study failed to demonstrate an added benefit of the DT intervention in improving participants' mobility and participation. Overwhelmingly, favorable participants' opinions about the intervention support its potential impact.

PMID: 32982831 [PubMed]