Keyword search (3,448 papers available)


Development and validation of the multidimensional version of the Fear of Self Questionnaire: Corrupted, culpable and malformed feared possible selves in obsessive-compulsive and body-dysmorphic symptoms.

Author(s): Aardema F, Radomsky AS, Moulding R, Wong SF, Bourguignon L, Giraldo-O'Meara M

In recent years, cognitive-behavioural models of OCD have increasingly recognized the potential role of feared possible selves in the development and maintenance of OCD, while simultaneously re-examining factors that have historically been linked to self-pe...

Article GUID: 33547834

"Was I asking for it?": An experimental investigation of perceived responsibility, mental contamination and workplace sexual harassment.

Author(s): Krause S, Radomsky AS

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Mental contamination (i.e., contamination concerns that arise in the absence of direct contact with a contaminant) is a common symptom in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Cognitive theories suggest that it results from individ...

Article GUID: 33321247

The Covert and Overt Reassurance Seeking Inventory (CORSI): Development, validation and psychometric analyses.

Author(s): Radomsky AS, Neal RL, Parrish CL, Lavoie SL, Schell SE

BACKGROUND: Reassurance seeking (RS) is motivated by perceived general and social/relational threats across disorders, yet is often under-recognized because it occurs in covert (i.e. subtle) and overt forms. Covert safety-seeking behaviour may maintain diso...

Article GUID: 33046164

Prediction Errors in Depression: A Quasi-Experimental Analysis.

Author(s): Radomsky AS, Wong SF, Dussault D, Gilchrist PT, Tesolin SB

J Cogn Psychother. 2019 Nov 01;33(4):320-330 Authors: Radomsky AS, Wong SF, Dussault D, Gilchrist PT, Tesolin SB

Article GUID: 32746394

Hoping for more: How cognitive science has and hasn't been helpful to the OCD clinician.

Author(s): Ouimet AJ, Ashbaugh AR, Radomsky AS

Clin Psychol Rev. 2019 04;69:14-29 Authors: Ouimet AJ, Ashbaugh AR, Radomsky AS

Article GUID: 29673581

Cognitive therapy for compulsive checking in obsessive-compulsive disorder: A pilot trial.

Author(s): Radomsky AS, Giraldo-O'Meara M, Wong SF, Dugas MJ, Gelfand LA, Rachman S, Schell S, Senn JM, Shafran R, Whittal ML

Psychiatry Res. 2020 Feb 05;286:112850 Authors: Radomsky AS, Giraldo-O'Meara M, Wong SF, Dugas MJ, Gelfand LA, Rachman S, Schell S, Senn JM, Shafran R, Whittal ML

Article GUID: 32070838

Beliefs about losing control, obsessions, and caution: An experimental investigation.

Author(s): Gagné JP, Radomsky AS

Behav Res Ther. 2020 Jan 30;126:103574 Authors: Gagné JP, Radomsky AS

Article GUID: 32045733

What do you really need? Self- and partner-reported intervention preferences within cognitive behavioural therapy for reassurance seeking behaviour.

Author(s): Neal RL, Radomsky AS

Behav Cogn Psychother. 2019 Sep 09;:1-13 Authors: Neal RL, Radomsky AS

Article GUID: 31495351

When it's at: An examination of when cognitive change occurs during cognitive therapy for compulsive checking in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Author(s): Radomsky AS, Wong SF, Giraldo-O'Meara M, Dugas MJ, Gelfand LA, Myhr G, Schell SE, Senn JM, Shafran R, Whittal ML

J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2018 Dec 07;: Authors: Radomsky AS, Wong SF, Giraldo-O'Meara M, Dugas MJ, Gelfand LA, Myhr G, Schell SE, Senn JM, Shafran R, Whittal ML

Article GUID: 30573211

The development and validation of the Beliefs About Losing Control Inventory (BALCI).

Author(s): Radomsky AS, Gagné JP

Cogn Behav Ther. 2019 May 29;:1-16 Authors: Radomsky AS, Gagné JP

Article GUID: 31140370


Title:What do you really need? Self- and partner-reported intervention preferences within cognitive behavioural therapy for reassurance seeking behaviour.
Authors:Neal RLRadomsky AS
Link:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31495351?dopt=Abstract
DOI:10.1017/S135246581900050X
Category:Behav Cogn Psychother
PMID:31495351
Dept Affiliation: PSYCHOLOGY
1 Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montréal, Canada.

Description:

What do you really need? Self- and partner-reported intervention preferences within cognitive behavioural therapy for reassurance seeking behaviour.

Behav Cogn Psychother. 2019 Sep 09;:1-13

Authors: Neal RL, Radomsky AS

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reassurance seeking (RS) in obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) is commonly addressed in cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) using a technique called reducing accommodation. Reducing accommodation is a behaviourally based CBT intervention that may be effective; however, there is a lack of controlled research on its use and acceptability to clients/patients, and case studies suggest that it can be associated with negative emotional/behavioural consequences. Providing support to encourage coping with distress is a cognitively based CBT intervention that may be an effective alternative, but lacks evidence regarding its acceptability.

AIMS: This study aimed to determine whether support provision may be a more acceptable/endorsed CBT intervention for RS than a strict reducing accommodation approach.

METHOD: Participants and familiar partners (N = 179) read vignette descriptions of accommodation reduction and support interventions, and responded to measures of perceived intervention acceptability/adhereability and endorsement, before completing a forced-choice preference task.

RESULTS: Overall, findings suggested that participants and partners gave significantly higher ratings for the support than the accommodation reduction intervention (partial ?2 = .049 to .321). Participants and partners also both selected the support intervention more often than the traditional reducing accommodation intervention when given the choice.

CONCLUSIONS: Support provision is perceived as an acceptable CBT intervention for RS by participants and their familiar partners. These results have implications for cognitive behavioural theory and practice related to RS.

PMID: 31495351 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]