Keyword search (3,619 papers available)


Development and validation of the multidimensional version of the Fear of Self Questionnaire: Corrupted, culpable and malformed feared possible selves in obsessive-compulsive and body-dysmorphic symptoms.

Author(s): Aardema F, Radomsky AS, Moulding R, Wong SF, Bourguignon L, Giraldo-O'Meara M

In recent years, cognitive-behavioural models of OCD have increasingly recognized the potential role of feared possible selves in the development and maintenance of OCD, while simultaneously re-examining factors that have historically been linked to self-pe...

Article GUID: 33547834
"Was I asking for it?": An experimental investigation of perceived responsibility, mental contamination and workplace sexual harassment.

Author(s): Krause S, Radomsky AS

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Mental contamination (i.e., contamination concerns that arise in the absence of direct contact with a contaminant) is a common symptom in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Cognitive theories suggest that it results from individ...

Article GUID: 33321247
The Covert and Overt Reassurance Seeking Inventory (CORSI): Development, validation and psychometric analyses.

Author(s): Radomsky AS, Neal RL, Parrish CL, Lavoie SL, Schell SE

BACKGROUND: Reassurance seeking (RS) is motivated by perceived general and social/relational threats across disorders, yet is often under-recognized because it occurs in covert (i.e. subtle) and overt forms. Covert safety-seeking behaviour may maintain diso...

Article GUID: 33046164
Prediction Errors in Depression: A Quasi-Experimental Analysis.

Author(s): Radomsky AS, Wong SF, Dussault D, Gilchrist PT, Tesolin SB

J Cogn Psychother. 2019 Nov 01;33(4):320-330 Authors: Radomsky AS, Wong SF, Dussault D, Gilchrist PT, Tesolin SB

Article GUID: 32746394
Hoping for more: How cognitive science has and hasn't been helpful to the OCD clinician.

Author(s): Ouimet AJ, Ashbaugh AR, Radomsky AS

Clin Psychol Rev. 2019 04;69:14-29 Authors: Ouimet AJ, Ashbaugh AR, Radomsky AS

Article GUID: 29673581
Cognitive therapy for compulsive checking in obsessive-compulsive disorder: A pilot trial.

Author(s): Radomsky AS, Giraldo-O'Meara M, Wong SF, Dugas MJ, Gelfand LA, Rachman S, Schell S, Senn JM, Shafran R, Whittal ML

Psychiatry Res. 2020 Feb 05;286:112850 Authors: Radomsky AS, Giraldo-O'Meara M, Wong SF, Dugas MJ, Gelfand LA, Rachman S, Schell S, Senn JM, Shafran R, Whittal ML

Article GUID: 32070838
Beliefs about losing control, obsessions, and caution: An experimental investigation.

Author(s): Gagné JP, Radomsky AS

Behav Res Ther. 2020 Jan 30;126:103574 Authors: Gagné JP, Radomsky AS

Article GUID: 32045733
What do you really need? Self- and partner-reported intervention preferences within cognitive behavioural therapy for reassurance seeking behaviour.

Author(s): Neal RL, Radomsky AS

Behav Cogn Psychother. 2019 Sep 09;:1-13 Authors: Neal RL, Radomsky AS

Article GUID: 31495351
When it's at: An examination of when cognitive change occurs during cognitive therapy for compulsive checking in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Author(s): Radomsky AS, Wong SF, Giraldo-O'Meara M, Dugas MJ, Gelfand LA, Myhr G, Schell SE, Senn JM, Shafran R, Whittal ML

J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2018 Dec 07;: Authors: Radomsky AS, Wong SF, Giraldo-O'Meara M, Dugas MJ, Gelfand LA, Myhr G, Schell SE, Senn JM, Shafran R, Whittal ML

Article GUID: 30573211
The development and validation of the Beliefs About Losing Control Inventory (BALCI).

Author(s): Radomsky AS, Gagné JP

Cogn Behav Ther. 2019 May 29;:1-16 Authors: Radomsky AS, Gagné JP

Article GUID: 31140370
Title:Hoping for more: How cognitive science has and hasn't been helpful to the OCD clinician.
Authors:Ouimet AJ,  Ashbaugh AR,  Radomsky AS
Link:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29673581?dopt=Abstract
DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2018.04.003
Category:Clin Psychol Rev
PMID:29673581
Dept Affiliation: PSYCHOLOGY
1 School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, 136 Jean-Jacques Lussier, VNR 3rd Floor, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada. Electronic address: Allison.Ouimet@uOttawa.ca.
2 School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, 136 Jean-Jacques Lussier, VNR 3rd Floor, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada. Electronic address: Andrea.Ashbaugh@uOttawa.ca.
3 Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Psychology Building, 7141 Sherbrooke St., West Montreal, QC H4B 1R6, Canada. Electronic address: Adam.Radomsky@Concordia.ca.

Description:

Hoping for more: How cognitive science has and hasn't been helpful to the OCD clinician.

Clin Psychol Rev. 2019 04;69:14-29

Authors: Ouimet AJ, Ashbaugh AR, Radomsky AS

Abstract

Cognitive-behavioural models of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) stemmed from knowledge acquired from cognitive science. Researchers continue to apply basic cognitive-affective science methods to understanding OCD, with the overarching goal of improving and refining evidence-based treatments. However, the degree to which such research has contributed to this goal is unclear. We reviewed OCD research in the general areas that comprise basic cognitive science, and evaluated the degree to which it has contributed to our understanding of the development, maintenance, and treatment of OCD. We focused on studies that either compared people with and without OCD and/or used experimental psychopathology methods with human participants, and attempted to resolve some of the conflicting theories related to the importance of cognitive deficits vs. cognitive biases. Overall, we observed equivocal findings for deficits in perception, attention, memory, and executive functioning. Moreover, many so-called deficits were moderated and/or explained by OCD-relevant beliefs, highlighting the role of confidence in cognitive processes as integral to our understanding of OCD. We discussed these findings in terms of cognitive measurement, cognitive-behavioural models, and clinical applicability, and made recommendations for future research that may offer innovation and insight helpful to clinicians working to improve the symptoms and lives of people with OCD.

PMID: 29673581 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]