Reset filters

Search publications


By keyword
By department

No publications found.

 

The Effects of Combined Motor Control and Isolated Extensor Strengthening versus General Exercise on Paraspinal Muscle Morphology, Composition, and Function in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors: Fortin MRye MRoussac AMontpetit CBurdick JNaghdi NRosenstein BBertrand CMacedo LGElliott JMDover GDeMont RWeber MHPepin V


Affiliations

1 Department of Health, Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC H4B 1R6, Canada.
2 School of Health, Concordia University, Montreal, QC H4B 1R6, Canada.
3 School of Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 1C7, Canada.
4 Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, The Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.
5 Northern Sydney Local Health District, St. Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia.
6 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H3J 1A4, Canada.

Description

Low back pain (LBP), a globally widespread and persistent musculoskeletal disorder, benefits from exercise therapy. However, it remains unclear which type leads to greater changes in paraspinal muscle health. This study aimed to (1) compare the effects of a combined motor control and isolated lumbar extension exercise (MC+ILEX) versus a general exercise (GE) intervention on paraspinal muscle morphology, composition, and function, and (2) examine whether alterations in paraspinal muscle health were correlated with improvements in pain, function, and quality of life. Fifty participants with chronic LBP were randomly assigned to each group and underwent a 12-week supervised intervention program. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound assessments were acquired at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks to examine the impact of each intervention on erector spinae (ES) and multifidus (MF) muscle size (cross-sectional area, CSA), composition, and function at L4-L5 and L5-S1. Self-reported questionnaires were also acquired to assess participant-oriented outcomes. Our findings indicated that the MC+ILEX group demonstrated greater improvements in MF and ES CSA, along with MF thickness at both levels (all p < 0.01). Both groups significantly improved in pain, function, and quality of life. This study provided preliminary results suggesting that an MC+ILEX intervention may improve paraspinal morphology while decreasing pain and disability.

Links

PubMed: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37762861/

DOI: 10.3390/jcm12185920