Keyword search (3,447 papers available)


Accuracy and spatial properties of distributed magnetic source imaging techniques in the investigation of focal epilepsy patients.

Author(s): Pellegrino G, Hedrich T, Porras-Bettancourt M, Lina JM, Aydin Ü, Hall J, Grova C, Kobayashi E

Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 May 09;: Authors: Pellegrino G, Hedrich T, Porras-Bettancourt M, Lina JM, Aydin Ü, Hall J, Grova C, Kobayashi E

Article GUID: 32386115
Magnetoencephalography resting state connectivity patterns as indicatives of surgical outcome in epilepsy patients.

Author(s): Aydin Ü, Pellegrino G, Bin Ka'b Ali O, Abdallah C, Dubeau F, Lina JM, Kobayashi E, Grova C

J Neural Eng. 2020 Mar 18;: Authors: Aydin Ü, Pellegrino G, Bin Ka'b Ali O, Abdallah C, Dubeau F, Lina JM, Kobayashi E, Grova C

Article GUID: 32191632
Influence of Head Tissue Conductivity Uncertainties on EEG Dipole Reconstruction.

Author(s): Vorwerk J, Aydin Ü, Wolters CH, Butson CR

Front Neurosci. 2019;13:531 Authors: Vorwerk J, Aydin Ü, Wolters CH, Butson CR

Article GUID: 31231178
Zoomed MRI Guided by Combined EEG/MEG Source Analysis: A Multimodal Approach for Optimizing Presurgical Epilepsy Work-up and its Application in a Multi-focal Epilepsy Patient Case Study.

Author(s): Aydin Ü, Rampp S, Wollbrink A, Kugel H, Cho J-, Knösche TR, Grova C, Wellmer J, Wolters CH

Brain Topogr. 2017 Jul;30(4):417-433 Authors: Aydin Ü, Rampp S, Wollbrink A, Kugel H, Cho J-, Knösche TR, Grova C, Wellmer J, Wolters CH

Article GUID: 28510905
Reproducibility of EEG-MEG fusion source analysis of interictal spikes: Relevance in presurgical evaluation of epilepsy.

Author(s): Chowdhury RA, Pellegrino G, Aydin Ü, Lina JM, Dubeau F, Kobayashi E, Grova C

Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 02;39(2):880-901 Authors: Chowdhury RA, Pellegrino G, Aydin Ü, Lina JM, Dubeau F, Kobayashi E, Grova C

Article GUID: 29164737
Title:Accuracy and spatial properties of distributed magnetic source imaging techniques in the investigation of focal epilepsy patients.
Authors:Pellegrino G,  Hedrich T,  Porras-Bettancourt M,  Lina JM,  Aydin Ü,  Hall J,  Grova C,  Kobayashi E
Link:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32386115?dopt=Abstract
DOI:10.1002/hbm.24994
Category:Hum Brain Mapp
PMID:32386115
Dept Affiliation: PERFORM
1 Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
2 IRCCS Fondazione San Camillo Hospital, Venice, Italy.
3 Department of Multimodal Functional Imaging Lab, Biomedical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
4 Departement de Genie Electrique, Ecole de Technologie Superieure, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
5 Centre de Recherches Mathematiques, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
6 Physics Department and PERFORM Centre, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Description:

Accuracy and spatial properties of distributed magnetic source imaging techniques in the investigation of focal epilepsy patients.

Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 May 09;:

Authors: Pellegrino G, Hedrich T, Porras-Bettancourt M, Lina JM, Aydin Ü, Hall J, Grova C, Kobayashi E

Abstract

Source localization of interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) is clinically useful in the presurgical workup of epilepsy patients. We aimed to compare the performance of four different distributed magnetic source imaging (dMSI) approaches: Minimum norm estimate (MNE), dynamic statistical parametric mapping (dSPM), standardized low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA), and coherent maximum entropy on the mean (cMEM). We also evaluated whether a simple average of maps obtained from multiple inverse solutions (Ave) can improve localization accuracy. We analyzed dMSI of 206 IEDs derived from magnetoencephalography recordings in 28 focal epilepsy patients who had a well-defined focus determined through intracranial EEG (iEEG), epileptogenic MRI lesions or surgical resection. dMSI accuracy and spatial properties were quantitatively estimated as: (a) distance from the epilepsy focus, (b) reproducibility, (c) spatial dispersion (SD), (d) map extension, and (e) effect of thresholding on map properties. Clinical performance was excellent for all methods (median distance from the focus MNE = 2.4?mm; sLORETA = 3.5?mm; cMEM = 3.5?mm; dSPM = 6.8?mm, Ave = 0?mm). Ave showed the lowest distance between the map maximum and epilepsy focus (Dmin lower than cMEM, MNE, and dSPM, p =?.021, p =?.008, p <?.001, respectively). cMEM showed the best spatial features, with lowest SD outside the focus (SD lower than all other methods, p <?.001 consistently) and high contrast between the generator and surrounding regions. The average map Ave provided the best localization accuracy, whereas cMEM exhibited the lowest amount of spurious distant activity. dMSI techniques have the potential to significantly improve identification of iEEG targets and to guide surgical planning, especially when multiple methods are combined.

PMID: 32386115 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]