Keyword search (3,448 papers available) |
Author(s): Elshafei M, Costa DE, Shihab E
Nowadays, Human Activity Recognition (HAR) systems, which use wearables and smart systems, are a part of our daily life. Despite the abundance of literature in the area, little is known about the impact of muscle fatigue on these systems' performance. I...
Article GUID: 33557239
Author(s): Elshafei M, Shihab E
Fatigue is a naturally occurring phenomenon during human activities, but it poses a bigger risk for injuries during physically demanding activities, such as gym activities and athletics. Several studies show that bicep muscle fatigue can lead to various inj...
Article GUID: 33498702
Author(s): Singh P, Abedini Sohi P, Kahrizi M
In this work, we have designed and simulated a graphene field effect transistor (GFET) with the purpose of developing a sensitive biosensor for methanethiol, a biomarker for bacterial infections. The surface of a graphene layer is functionalized by manipula...
Article GUID: 33467459
Author(s): Khannouz M; Glatard T;
This paper evaluates data stream classifiers from the perspective of connected devices, focusing on the use case of Human Activity Recognition. We measure both the classification performance and resource consumption (runtime, memory, and power) of five usua...
Article GUID: 33202905
Author(s): Lessard-Tremblay M, Weeks J, Morelli L, Cowan G, Gagnon G, Zednik RJ
Traditional capacitive electrocardiogram (cECG) electrodes suffer from limited patient comfort, difficulty of disinfection and low signal-to-noise ratio in addition to the challenge of integrating them in wearables. A novel hybrid flexible cECG electrode wa...
Article GUID: 32927651
Author(s): Azami P, Jan T, Iranmanesh S, Ameri Sianaki O, Hajiebrahimi S
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Apr 16;20(8): Authors: Azami P, Jan T, Iranmanesh S, Ameri Sianaki O, Hajiebrahimi S
Article GUID: 32316356
Author(s): Dehghani A, Sarbishei O, Glatard T, Shihab E
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Nov 18;19(22): Authors: Dehghani A, Sarbishei O, Glatard T, Shihab E
Article GUID: 31752158
Author(s): Alsaig A, Alagar V, Chammaa Z, Shiri N
Sensors (Basel). 2019 May 28;19(11): Authors: Alsaig A, Alagar V, Chammaa Z, Shiri N
Article GUID: 31141899
Author(s): Li K, Wang H, Xu X, Du Y, Liu Y, Ahmad MO
Sensors (Basel). 2018 May 15;18(5): Authors: Li K, Wang H, Xu X, Du Y, Liu Y, Ahmad MO
Article GUID: 29762493
Author(s): Salim I, Hamza AB
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Jul 21;18(7): Authors: Salim I, Hamza AB
Article GUID: 30037109
Author(s): Wang H, Xie S, Li K, Ahmad MO
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Feb 22;19(4): Authors: Wang H, Xie S, Li K, Ahmad MO
Article GUID: 30813353
Author(s): Reyno T, Underhill PR, Krause TW, Marsden C, Wowk D
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Sep 14;17(9): Authors: Reyno T, Underhill PR, Krause TW, Marsden C, Wowk D
Article GUID: 28906434
Title: | A Benchmark of Data Stream Classification for Human Activity Recognition on Connected Objects. |
Authors: | Khannouz M, Glatard T, |
Link: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33202905 |
DOI: | 10.3390/s20226486 |
Category: | Sensors (Basel) |
PMID: | 33202905 |
Dept Affiliation: | ENCS
1 Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Concordia University, Montréal, QC H3G 1M8, Canada. |
Description: |
This paper evaluates data stream classifiers from the perspective of connected devices, focusing on the use case of Human Activity Recognition. We measure both the classification performance and resource consumption (runtime, memory, and power) of five usual stream classification algorithms, implemented in a consistent library, and applied to two real human activity datasets and three synthetic datasets. Regarding classification performance, the results show the overall superiority of the Hoeffding Tree, the Mondrian forest, and the Naïve Bayes classifiers over the Feedforward Neural Network and the Micro Cluster Nearest Neighbor classifiers on four datasets out of six, including the real ones. In addition, the Hoeffding Tree and-to some extent-the Micro Cluster Nearest Neighbor, are the only classifiers that can recover from a concept drift. Overall, the three leading classifiers still perform substantially worse than an offline classifier on the real datasets. Regarding resource consumption, the Hoeffding Tree and the Mondrian forest are the most memory intensive and have the longest runtime; however, no difference in power consumption is found between classifiers. We conclude that stream learning for Human Activity Recognition on connected objects is challenged by two factors which could lead to interesting future work: a high memory consumption and low F1 scores overall. PMID: 33202905 [PubMed - in process] |