Keyword search (3,447 papers available)


A Go/No-go delayed nonmatching-to-sample procedure to measure object-recognition memory in rats.

Author(s): Cole E, Chad M, Moman V, Mumby DG

Behav Processes. 2020 Jun 10;:104180 Authors: Cole E, Chad M, Moman V, Mumby DG

Article GUID: 32533993

Effects of perirhinal cortex and hippocampal lesions on rats' performance on two object-recognition tasks.

Author(s): Cole E, Ziadé J, Simundic A, Mumby DG

Behav Brain Res. 2019 Dec 23;:112450 Authors: Cole E, Ziadé J, Simundic A, Mumby DG

Article GUID: 31877339

Assessing object-recognition memory in rats: Pitfalls of the existent tasks and the advantages of a new test.

Author(s): Cole E, Simundic A, Mossa FP, Mumby DG

Learn Behav. 2018 Aug 21;: Authors: Cole E, Simundic A, Mossa FP, Mumby DG

Article GUID: 30132280

Modulatory effect of 17-β estradiol on performance of ovariectomized rats on the Shock-Probe test.

Author(s): Gervais NJ, Jacob S, Brake WG, Mumby DG

Physiol Behav. 2014 May 28;131:129-35 Authors: Gervais NJ, Jacob S, Brake WG, Mumby DG

Article GUID: 24768650

Retrograde and anterograde memory following selective damage to the dorsolateral entorhinal cortex.

Author(s): Gervais NJ, Barrett-Bernstein M, Sutherland RJ, Mumby DG

Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2014 Dec;116:14-26 Authors: Gervais NJ, Barrett-Bernstein M, Sutherland RJ, Mumby DG

Article GUID: 25108197

Attenuation of dendritic spine density in the perirhinal cortex following 17β-Estradiol replacement in the rat.

Author(s): Gervais NJ, Mumby DG, Brake WG

Hippocampus. 2015 Nov;25(11):1212-6 Authors: Gervais NJ, Mumby DG, Brake WG

Article GUID: 26104963

The effects of extrinsic stress on somatic markers and behavior are dependent on animal housing conditions.

Author(s): Huzard D, Mumby DG, Sandi C, Poirier GL, van der Kooij MA

Physiol Behav. 2015 Nov 01;151:238-45 Authors: Huzard D, Mumby DG, Sandi C, Poirier GL, van der Kooij MA

Article GUID: 26220463

Intra-perirhinal cortex administration of estradiol, but not an ERβ agonist, modulates object-recognition memory in ovariectomized rats.

Author(s): Gervais NJ, Hamel LM, Brake WG, Mumby DG

Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2016 09;133:89-99 Authors: Gervais NJ, Hamel LM, Brake WG, Mumby DG

Article GUID: 27321161

Circadian time-place (or time-route) learning in rats with hippocampal lesions.

Author(s): Cole E, Mistlberger RE, Merza D, Trigiani LJ, Madularu D, Simundic A, Mumby DG

Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2016 Dec;136:236-243 Authors: Cole E, Mistlberger RE, Merza D, Trigiani LJ, Madularu D, Simundic A, Mumby DG

Article GUID: 27622983


Title:Modulatory effect of 17-β estradiol on performance of ovariectomized rats on the Shock-Probe test.
Authors:Gervais NJJacob SBrake WGMumby DG
Link:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24768650?dopt=Abstract
Category:Physiol Behav
PMID:24768650
Dept Affiliation: PSYCHOLOGY
1 Center for Studies in Behavioral Neurobiology, Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Electronic address: Nicole.Gervais@concordia.ca.
2 Center for Studies in Behavioral Neurobiology, Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Description:

Modulatory effect of 17-ß estradiol on performance of ovariectomized rats on the Shock-Probe test.

Physiol Behav. 2014 May 28;131:129-35

Authors: Gervais NJ, Jacob S, Brake WG, Mumby DG

Abstract

17-ß estradiol (E2) has been shown to modulate fear conditioning by influencing freezing behavior following re-exposure to either the conditioning context or a cue associated with shock. Fear-related behaviors other than freezing may be influenced differently by E2 replacement. Accordingly, the present study examined whether E2 modulates fear conditioning using the Shock-Probe test, which allows for the observation of multiple fear responses. Ovariectomized (OVX) rats were divided into three groups: no E2 replacement (Shock-Oil; 0.1ml/kg sesame oil), high E2 replacement (Shock-E2; 3 daily doses of 10µg/kg, s.c.), and a no shock, no E2 replacement (Naïve-oil) group. During the acquisition phase, the two shock groups (Shock-Oil and Shock-E2) demonstrated comparable fear expression on all measures. During the retention tests, rats without E2 replacement demonstrated intact contextual-fear conditioning but impaired cued-fear conditioning, while rats with E2 replacement demonstrated the opposite pattern. In the context paired with shock, the Shock-Oil group spent more time burying the probe than both the Naïve-oil group and Shock-E2 group. The Shock-E2 group avoided the probe area relative to the other two groups when tested in the context unpaired with shock. The present findings demonstrate the importance of using multiple behaviors to measure fear conditioning and suggest that high E2 replacement impairs contextual and facilitates cued fear conditioning.

PMID: 24768650 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]