Keyword search (3,447 papers available)


A Go/No-go delayed nonmatching-to-sample procedure to measure object-recognition memory in rats.

Author(s): Cole E, Chad M, Moman V, Mumby DG

Behav Processes. 2020 Jun 10;:104180 Authors: Cole E, Chad M, Moman V, Mumby DG

Article GUID: 32533993

Effects of perirhinal cortex and hippocampal lesions on rats' performance on two object-recognition tasks.

Author(s): Cole E, Ziadé J, Simundic A, Mumby DG

Behav Brain Res. 2019 Dec 23;:112450 Authors: Cole E, Ziadé J, Simundic A, Mumby DG

Article GUID: 31877339

Assessing object-recognition memory in rats: Pitfalls of the existent tasks and the advantages of a new test.

Author(s): Cole E, Simundic A, Mossa FP, Mumby DG

Learn Behav. 2018 Aug 21;: Authors: Cole E, Simundic A, Mossa FP, Mumby DG

Article GUID: 30132280

Modulatory effect of 17-β estradiol on performance of ovariectomized rats on the Shock-Probe test.

Author(s): Gervais NJ, Jacob S, Brake WG, Mumby DG

Physiol Behav. 2014 May 28;131:129-35 Authors: Gervais NJ, Jacob S, Brake WG, Mumby DG

Article GUID: 24768650

Retrograde and anterograde memory following selective damage to the dorsolateral entorhinal cortex.

Author(s): Gervais NJ, Barrett-Bernstein M, Sutherland RJ, Mumby DG

Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2014 Dec;116:14-26 Authors: Gervais NJ, Barrett-Bernstein M, Sutherland RJ, Mumby DG

Article GUID: 25108197

Attenuation of dendritic spine density in the perirhinal cortex following 17β-Estradiol replacement in the rat.

Author(s): Gervais NJ, Mumby DG, Brake WG

Hippocampus. 2015 Nov;25(11):1212-6 Authors: Gervais NJ, Mumby DG, Brake WG

Article GUID: 26104963

The effects of extrinsic stress on somatic markers and behavior are dependent on animal housing conditions.

Author(s): Huzard D, Mumby DG, Sandi C, Poirier GL, van der Kooij MA

Physiol Behav. 2015 Nov 01;151:238-45 Authors: Huzard D, Mumby DG, Sandi C, Poirier GL, van der Kooij MA

Article GUID: 26220463

Intra-perirhinal cortex administration of estradiol, but not an ERβ agonist, modulates object-recognition memory in ovariectomized rats.

Author(s): Gervais NJ, Hamel LM, Brake WG, Mumby DG

Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2016 09;133:89-99 Authors: Gervais NJ, Hamel LM, Brake WG, Mumby DG

Article GUID: 27321161

Circadian time-place (or time-route) learning in rats with hippocampal lesions.

Author(s): Cole E, Mistlberger RE, Merza D, Trigiani LJ, Madularu D, Simundic A, Mumby DG

Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2016 Dec;136:236-243 Authors: Cole E, Mistlberger RE, Merza D, Trigiani LJ, Madularu D, Simundic A, Mumby DG

Article GUID: 27622983


Title:Assessing object-recognition memory in rats: Pitfalls of the existent tasks and the advantages of a new test.
Authors:Cole ESimundic AMossa FPMumby DG
Link:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30132280?dopt=Abstract
Category:Learn Behav
PMID:30132280
Dept Affiliation: PSYCHOLOGY
1 Department of Psychology, SP-244, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke St. W., Montreal, Quebec, H4B 1R6, Canada. emily.cole@concordia.ca.
2 Department of Psychology, SP-244, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke St. W., Montreal, Quebec, H4B 1R6, Canada.

Description:

Assessing object-recognition memory in rats: Pitfalls of the existent tasks and the advantages of a new test.

Learn Behav. 2018 Aug 21;:

Authors: Cole E, Simundic A, Mossa FP, Mumby DG

Abstract

Studies of object-recognition memory in lab rats began in the late 1980s, using variants of the trial-unique delayed nonmatching-to-sample (DNMS) task. By the end of the 20th century, most investigators who wanted to study object-recognition in rodents had abandoned the DNMS task in favor of the novel-object-preference (NOP) test, mainly because the latter test is relatively easy to employ, whereas conventional DNMS tasks are not. Some concerns have been raised, however, about the internal validity of the NOP test as a method of measuring object-recognition abilities. We describe two experiments using a new DNMS procedure which requires considerably less training than the DNMS tasks of the 1980s and 1990s, and which cannot be subject to the same criticisms that have been leveled at the NOP test. In Experiment 1, rats were trained on the new modified-DNMS (mDNMS) task using short delays. Rats successfully learned the nonmatching rule in fewer than 25 trials, and they made accurate choices with retention intervals of up to 10 min. Experiment 2 examined a different group of rats' performance on the mDNMS task following long retention intervals (72 h, 3 weeks, and ~45 weeks). Rats made accurate choices on all retention intervals, even the longest retention interval of ~45 weeks. Overall, the findings demonstrate some benefits of an alternative approach to assess object-recognition memory in rats.

PMID: 30132280 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]